Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It looks like the only Republican Senators willing to lead the charge for this woman are her personal friends or RINOS like the Gang of 14's Lindsey Graham and liberal Arlen Specter. Wonder why...
1 posted on 10/09/2005 4:28:22 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ol' Sparky
When Arlen Specter says she needs to bone up on constitutional law, you know she's really unqualified. If her supporters are supplying material for late night comedy jokes, the jig's up. Miers may be able to survive attacks from political foes but her friends are not doing her any real favors.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
2 posted on 10/09/2005 4:32:04 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
It is a very confusing and scary time for many of us. It did not need to be this way, it really didn't.

This pick is just baffling. Just downright baffling.

Almost a week later, I am still stunned and disappointed. I know I am not alone.

This simply does not bode well for the near future. Imagine if she rules in favor of McCain/Feingold. it'll be crippling in 2006.
3 posted on 10/09/2005 4:39:20 PM PDT by TitansAFC ("It would be a hard government that should tax its people 1/10th part of their income."-Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
Friend Hecht is a conservative Texas Supreme Court Justice.  He's just the sort of fellow critics ought to be paying attention to.

WALLACE: Justice Hecht, I know that you've talked to your old friend, Harriet Miers, this week. How does she respond to these attacks by conservatives that she's just a crony of the president and that her nomination is a joke?

HECHT: Well, it's just false and the criticism just rolls off her back. She's got a record miles long. This is a very solid appointment because of a solid, consistent track record over the years.

And to say that she doesn't have experience with these constitutional issues or with judicial philosophy -- she's been vetting for the president judicial candidates to the federal bench.

She has to know what is involved in these constitutional issues and judicial philosophy and inquire of candidates where they stand. And so I can't think of anybody else who would have had more experience with these issues on the ground than Harriet's had.

WALLACE: But what has she specifically said to you when people say she's just a crony, that this nomination is a joke?

HECHT: She just dusts it off. She knows it's not true, that the president has chosen her because he's watched her for 10 years. He's thrown her hardballs. You ask your lawyer time and again what's the answer to this question. Your lawyer gives you good advice. What do you think after 10 years? That she's a great lawyer.

WALLACE: Justice Hecht, let me ask you one other question. Bill Kristol, a member of our panel who will be on in a few minutes, says that this is such a bad nomination that Harriet Miers should actually consider stepping aside. Any chance of that?

HECHT: No chance at all. I mean, she is going to see this through, but not only that. Senator Graham says when her record becomes more apparent to the American people -- and they're going to see it in this confirmation process -- then not only is she not going to withdraw, people are going to herald this nomination as a good one.

The only way she'll withdraw from the contest, which isn't at all likely for a Texas gal with her reputation, is if she makes a mess of the hearings and becomes the embarrassment Fair Weather Republicans claim she is.

4 posted on 10/09/2005 4:40:04 PM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

I can tell you why.
Lindsey Graham is one weak-kneed RINO, who does not want to vote on the NUKE option. He'll support anything to having to cast a vote to break a fillibuster.
The Gang of 14 Idiots Boxed Bush in on his pick.
South Carolina, Throw the bum out!


5 posted on 10/09/2005 4:42:01 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

Bauer and all the direct-mail money men obviously want a controversy to raise money. I wouldn't trust that little weasel with anything, much less the future of conservatism.


7 posted on 10/09/2005 5:07:51 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky
He said he hasn't talked to her about Roe.

He had better say that unless he wants to get a subpoena from the RATS.

10 posted on 10/09/2005 5:48:47 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ol' Sparky

Look, the reason Bush nominated her was because the Dims have things on the others or their relatives, she is the only candidate at this time who probably can't be "Borked" or worse. We may not like it but the candidates themselves turned down Bush, not the other way around. They don't want their private lives dragged through the dirt and the mud.


19 posted on 10/09/2005 8:16:47 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson