Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Single molecule transistor could revolutionize electronics
Folio Staff ^ | June 10, 2005 | Scott Lingley

Posted on 10/09/2005 5:36:41 PM PDT by -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-

University of Alberta researchers have proven the potential for constructing electronic circuitry on a molecular scale, a breakthrough that could shatter the limitations of conventional transistor technology and pave the way for smaller, faster, cheaper microelectronic devices.

The report by National Research Council National Institute of Nanotechnology's Molecular Scale Development Group, led by U of A physics professor and iCORE Chair in Nanoscale Information and Communication Technologies Dr. Robert Wolkow, has been published in the June 2005 issue of the journal Nature.

Wolkow said his team has proven that a single molecule can be controllably charged while all the surrounding molecules remain neutral, causing it to act as a basic transistor. Transistors control the flow of current in most electronic devices and are combined to form integrated circuits used to make the microprocessors and memory chips that drive everything from computers and cell phones to household appliances.

But where conventional transistors might use a million electrons to switch a current, Wolkow's team was able to control the current through a hydrocarbon molecule using a single atom.

Wolkow emphasized that, while the concept his team tested is a long way from practical application, it undoubtedly fits the definition of a transistor, which has three terminals - an 'in,' and 'out,' and a control outlet.

"To call something a transistor, it needs a control element," Wolkow said. "We have control, but it's very sluggish and slow right now. It takes us on the order of minutes to change conditions that make current go or not, so for any computer technology, this thing is today impractical. But it's not hopeless. There are many hurdles, but there aren't any we see as insurmountable."

In fact, the research team has already cleared what appeared to be insurmountable obstacles in manipulating molecules measuring one one-billionth of a metre in size.

"It's very hard to connect wires to a molecule," Wolkow said. "Imagine trying to bring three watermelons together all to touch something the size of a poppy seed. You couldn't do it - you could make two watermelons touch a poppy seed, and even that would be kind of difficult, holding that poppy seed in place. But then to bring in the third watermelon is impossible - you can't have all three touching such a small object."

To solve this problem, the "transistor" molecule was placed on a silicon surface that had been exposed to hydrogen gas, so that each silicon atom was capped with a hydrogen atom. By removing the hydrogen cap from single silicon atom, that silicon atom could be made to conduct a charge while the surrounding atoms remained neutral. The tip of a powerful scanning tunneling microscope served as the on/off switch.

Practical nanoscale transistors may be decades away, Wolkow said, but the potential to create smaller, faster, more efficient electronic devices with minimal energy and material requirements is a powerful incentive to pursue this line of research. But, he added, the challenges are considerable.

"We need to make such an entity work without the need for a million-dollar scanning tunneling microscope hovering over each molecule. We'd like to get these things down to where they cost pennies. It's an engineering feat to put the right structures in place. We need to make a solid-state structure that provides that other contact which was provided by the probe of our scanning microscope."

Wolkow said the lead author of the study, U of A postdoctoral fellow Dr. Paul Piva, deserves special mention for championing the research and mustering the expertise of the his collaborators to design the concept and test it "in every way imaginable." Funding for the research was provided by iCORE, the National Research Council, Science and Engineering Research Canada (NSERC), the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the U of A and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research.

http://www.phys.ualberta.ca/~wolkow


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada
KEYWORDS: nano

1 posted on 10/09/2005 5:36:44 PM PDT by -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-
Now, time to tame some DNA and see what the biosphere is already thinking about.

We got a plug for it now.

2 posted on 10/09/2005 5:49:32 PM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Ping


3 posted on 10/09/2005 5:54:11 PM PDT by annie laurie (All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-

>We'd like to get these things down to where they cost pennies.

They need to do a lot better than that. Currently a penny's worth of silicon can have well over one million transistors.


4 posted on 10/09/2005 6:22:31 PM PDT by chipengineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-

you might want to go here
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1499488/posts?page=118#125
and enlighten some nano-scientists.


5 posted on 10/09/2005 6:31:37 PM PDT by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chipengineer
Something's going to have to give. Photo-lithography is reaching the limits. 90 nanometer is tough. 65 nanometer seems to not yet be feasible, and 45 nanometer is little more than a dream.
6 posted on 10/09/2005 6:37:44 PM PDT by stevio (Red-Blooded American Male (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chipengineer
Seriously? I can hardly find decent BJTs for less than 3 cents in volume, and logic chips with LSI seem to be at least half a buck, at best. Let alone millions of transistors...
7 posted on 10/09/2005 6:44:58 PM PDT by krb (ad hominem arguments are for stupid people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-

When Lucent's researchers were claiming molecular switches, even though it was supposedly still in the R&D stage, I bought in and lost thou$ands. Turns out the Lucent guy that was head of that program was making it up. That was several years back.


8 posted on 10/09/2005 7:22:33 PM PDT by Lester Moore (islam's allah is Satan and is NOT the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-

Bookmark


9 posted on 10/09/2005 7:25:25 PM PDT by RATkiller (I'm not communist, socialist, Democrat nor Republican so don't call me names)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis; ...
Thanks annie!

FutureTechPing!
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical
research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and
other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop.

10 posted on 10/09/2005 7:26:39 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
"It's very hard to connect wires to a molecule," Wolkow said.

I imagine so.

11 posted on 10/09/2005 7:35:24 PM PDT by PatrickHenry ( I won't respond to a troll, crackpot, half-wit, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

I'm still stuck on cold fusion and superconductors...(sigh)


12 posted on 10/09/2005 7:43:28 PM PDT by Solamente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Solamente

"cold fusion"

fraudulant.


13 posted on 10/09/2005 7:47:06 PM PDT by strategofr (The secret of happiness is freedom. And the secret of freedom is courage.---Thucydities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

That's my point.


14 posted on 10/09/2005 7:51:14 PM PDT by Solamente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: krb
A 1 GB compact flash module can be purchased retail for $70. This module has at least 1 billion transistors. This is about 150,000 transistors per penny.

L.P.

15 posted on 10/09/2005 8:05:42 PM PDT by Lagrange Point
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Solamente

"That's my point."

OK, I think I see. Superconductor science is real, but the technology never gets there. Cold fusion is fraudulent science. I wouldn't lump them together, but I see what you mean.


16 posted on 10/09/2005 8:08:46 PM PDT by strategofr (The secret of happiness is freedom. And the secret of freedom is courage.---Thucydities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stevio
90 nanometer is tough. 65 nanometer seems to not yet be feasible, and 45 nanometer is little more than a dream.

And here they're talking about going from 0.05 micron (50 nM) geometries down to around 0.0002 microns (0.2 nM)!

They can play with onesie-twosies using atomic force microscopes, but for production they'll have scale up the rate of transistor production from that of AFM technology by, oh, about a trillion times.

17 posted on 10/09/2005 8:52:32 PM PDT by Erasmus (A strong bow is a terrible thing to waste. Give to the Antonio Janigro College Fund.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

What?? Intel is about to release a 65nm chip into the market soon:

http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051007/index.html


18 posted on 10/09/2005 10:39:14 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: -=[_Super_Secret_Agent_]=-

Great just great. I'm never going to be able to find out where I left that radio now........


19 posted on 10/09/2005 11:38:43 PM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: festus; AntiGuv
Great just great. I'm never going to be able to find out where I left that radio now...

LOL! REM: The Inter-cranial Telephone Device, from the movie, President Analyst (James Colburn, starred in 1970)..like that "kinda" lost? :D

20 posted on 10/10/2005 3:27:16 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson