Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ejdrapes
Now we learn that it was Card who was the strongest advocate of moving Miers out of the West Wing altogether and onto the high court - raising the question of whether the ultimate motivation for this nomination is to open the way to hiring a new Counsel by kicking a failed Counsel upstairs.

I'm one of the Miers skeptics. But this language from the article doesn't pass the smell test.

2 posted on 10/10/2005 10:46:04 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ModelBreaker

No it doesn't and Frum offers up an out and out lie....

"it is just about the only endorsement Miers has received from any conservative with an established reputation in the law."
I guess Jay Sekulow doesn't qualify, or Leo either.


5 posted on 10/10/2005 10:50:38 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ModelBreaker

seems ridiculous...Card wants Miers for the SCOTUS to get rid of her???

That just seems crazy and stupid all rolled into one. Seems to me if they wanted to get rid of her they could have easily found a nice little job elsewhere for her.

I am starting to discount everything that Frum says.


8 posted on 10/10/2005 10:53:29 AM PDT by Pondman88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ModelBreaker

I'm not thrilled with Miers either...I think he wasted a perfect opportunity. But Frum gets on my nerves! Just read a piece he wrote last July saying that Bush may in fact pick Miers...and that if he did, Frum wanted to be remembered as the one who said it first. He did not seem so outraged as he does now.


134 posted on 10/10/2005 1:44:06 PM PDT by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ModelBreaker
It's been reported the reason Miers was named White House Counsel in the first place was that she had proven incompetent as Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy. Her boss, Chief of Staff Andy Card, badly wanted to get her out of his office - but couldn't fire her because she was protected by the president and the first lady. So he promoted her instead. Now we learn that it was Card who was the strongest advocate of moving Miers out of the West Wing altogether and onto the high court - raising the question of whether the ultimate motivation for this nomination is to open the way to hiring a new Counsel by kicking a failed Counsel upstairs.

I do not believe this...it would not happen

137 posted on 10/10/2005 1:49:30 PM PDT by woofie (Trying hard to become another Buckhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ModelBreaker

That's exactly the same thing I thought when I read this piece.

If Card did those things, and that is indeed the reason for her nomination, Harriet Miers isn't the one lacking intelligence and judgment, or concern about the Constitution or the SCOTUS. I'm very skeptical that Card would be that asinine, and nonchalant about such an important matter.


148 posted on 10/10/2005 3:48:32 PM PDT by LucyJo ("I have overcome the world." "Abide in Me." (John 16:33; 15:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ModelBreaker

Yeah, that's a lovely piece of fiction.


155 posted on 10/10/2005 7:34:57 PM PDT by nitejohnboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson