Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
It's a very weird area of thought crime we get into.

It is. Personally, if the actress is 18 or older, she is allowed to act in an X-rated film. Period. That's the law. When we start getting into the "fictional representation of children" it becomes subjective. What exactly constitutes dressing like or looking like or "fictionally representing" a child?

However, in Max's films, no effort is spared to make his actresses appear as child-like as possible.

47 posted on 10/10/2005 1:43:53 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Drew68
However, in Max's films, no effort is spared to make his actresses appear as child-like as possible.

I suppose it's only a matter of time before 3D animation gets so good, you can see a video of any sick thing you can imagine. What to do then. How about a chillingly lifelike digital cartoon of child rape? It will happen. What then? Just a weird, weird area to get into.

I used to draw cartoons. One time I drew a pretty raunchy one that I thought was funny. It had a woman--let me try to be careful here--receiving a male sheep, who might have been acting like a dog, if you get my meaning. The caption read "Mary had a little lamb." Should I have gotten busted for beastiality?

52 posted on 10/10/2005 1:48:00 PM PDT by Huck ("I'm calling a moratorium on Miers/Bush/GOP bashing--but it won't be easy (thanks tex))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson