Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: linkinpunk
A lot of conservatives are upset that we may not have to have a bloody knowdown-dragout fight with the dems. Somehow they think that the conservative movement needs a fight for the USSC more than it needs a conservative justice on it.

I can see how that may 'appear' that way, and there may be a few people that fall into that definition but in truth I don't think that's it. I do strongly feel that the 'objecting conservatives' WANT some assurance, some track record, especially in light of the large number of candidates that are out there.

95 posted on 10/11/2005 12:31:04 PM PDT by AgThorn (Bush is my president, but he needs to protect our borders. FIRST, before any talk of "Amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: AgThorn

You may be right.

But if we had a Clarence Thomas kind of fight, Rush's ratings would go through the roof in this off-election year.

Plus, I have had several freepers tell me that the fight is as important as the nominee himself/herself. ("It's long overdue. It's time we got this out in the open.")


101 posted on 10/11/2005 1:12:59 PM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson