Posted on 10/15/2005 6:03:13 AM PDT by Pokey78
Or was it all a set up by some rogue CIA? How could the office responsible for WMD assessment get it so wrong.
As part of their screw up they dispatch the husband of someone in the office?
Reporters calling about welfare reform and changing topics to Joseph Wilson -- sounds like entrapment to me.
Who's in charge? The people that were elected by the American electorate or Valerie Plame/Judy Miller/Joseph Wilson/NYT/George Soros?
An employee of the division, Valerie Wilson, suggested the agency send her husband, Joseph Wilson, a former U.S. ambassador to Gabon with experience in Niger, to Africa to make inquiries.
In a memo to the deputy director of the Counterproliferation Division, she wrote: "My husband has good relations with the PM [prime minister of Niger] and the former Minister of Mines (not to mention lots of French contacts), both of whom could possibly shed light on this sort of activity."
Mrs. Wilson would later say she asked her husband, on behalf of the CIA, if he would investigate "this crazy report" on a uranium deal between Iraq and Niger. Wilson agreed to go.
France and Joe
France and John Kerry
Joe and John.
It's not clear whether Fitzgerald is still following up the charge that someone leaked the name of a covert agent, or whether he may have uncovered other wrongdoing involving the violation of completely different statutes.
This account makes it clear enough that Wilson deliberately lied, and also that Plame set the whole thing up, either on her own hook or at Wilson's instigation.
Well, there was one somewhat peripheral point which I think needs some attention:
"INR analysts also expressed doubt that the transaction could have taken place because the uranium mines in Niger are controlled by a French consortium, which would be reluctant to work with Saddam Hussein--an objection that seems naive with the benefit of hindsight."
In point of fact, "naive" seems too weak a word to describe this evaluation. It was surely known at the time that it was FRANCE that built Saddam's nuclear plant in the first place--the one that was bombed by Israel--and that Chirac was the point man in charge of setting it up. It was also known that Chirac was Saddam's bosom buddy. If us unlookers knew all this at the time, surely our intelligence agencies knew it.
It has also been suggested that French intelligence was responsible for planting the forged yellowcake documents, possibly in an effort to discredit the real story.
Another story recently posted here, conjectural at this point, says that CIA agents forged the yellowcake documents, with the intention of showing up the Bush administration which was refusing their "expert" advice.
Doesn't all this deserve further investigation?
Thanks for this post. Bump for later.
I'm beginning to wonder if there is a Briar Patch Scenario going on here. MSM, the Wilsons, certain people in the CIA scream for an investigation....
Rove says, "Go ahead, please, throw us into that Briar Patch."
May be the best way to really put an end to Wilson's lies, public posturing and perhaps treasonous collusion with foreign operatives.
Given their history, it would not come as a shock if it were shown that the Wilsons are spies/double agents.
I am looking forward to the SP's report, and am happy to have read this article in the meantime. :-)
Pinz
cronyism.......plame gets wilson a job..
This reflects badly on the competence of our intelligence services. What else are they missing?
This was another of Wilson's claims that was flat out wrong. He assumed the VP had been briefed on the findings of his "research". This was key in that Wilson claimed the White House ignored his results when, in fact, they weren't even sent.
Wilson has been positively Clintonian in his ability to string falsehoods together. It can take a full hour to document the lies he packs into one paragraph.
If you need a "slam-dunk" argument on Wilson's credibility, look to the Kerry campaign. Wilson was one of Kerry's advisors. The Kerry campaign website linked to Wilson's. Then the Senate report came out and Pal Joey was unplugged. No longer a campaign advisor. No longer linked. Telling.
If the complaint and request for an investigation was initiated by Plame's supervisor (or at a relatively low, it could have passed through the various layers of the organization with relative ease. Supervisors/managers at each level might have been reluctant to question the request for fear that they would be accused of a cover-up so it flowed on to DoJ.
I still thing the fact that Wilson was not required to sign a confidentiality agreement is important. Who in their right mind would send someone on a sensitive (classified) mission without some formal and/or legal agreement? In my opinion, Wilson had no authority to release any information that he gained during the mission therefore his op ed compromised classified information.
I asked a couple of days ago if anyone had seen Scott Ritter connected to any of this reporting. With the hiding and moving of WMD that seems to have gone on during the Clinton years, and before this war, I wonder if the CIA has leaks that were benefitting Saddam.
Judith Miller wrote supportive articles in regards to the Bush administration's positions vis-a-vis WMD. I wonder if she may have found some of those leaks...
I wonder if the CIA PTB may have put a sting in place. Could Fitzpatrick be on the trail of a couple of CIA leakers? Their last names begin with W-i-l-s-o-n...
Or maybe I should just confine the use of tin foil to wrapping up fish for the grill... ;-)
Pinz
bttt
Gee, wonder why the New York times left this out?
Wilson's lies have received very little publicity. This is when I get irritated with big name Republicans who will not speak out more.
You should have seen the odd way that Joe Wilson*s website pages were done - especially after they were purged of content and swapped to instant
[META HTTP-EQUIV="Refresh" CONTENT="1; URL="Elsewhere.com.html"]
- But the webpage was still online
They looked much like John Kerry webmaster website style
The holographs were purportedly prepared by a Belgian, working at the behest of the DGSE.
later read
mark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.