[Panic in the Streets]

I am pro 2A, but if someone doesn't want you bringing a gun onto their property, it should be their right.

Just as it should be their right to disallow someone who is wearing color they don't like.

[Brad’s Gramma]

Just as it should be their right to disallow someone who is wearing color they don't like.

Huh?

[faireturn]

Panic in the Streets wrote:

I am pro 2A, but if someone doesn't want you bringing a gun onto their property, it should be their right.

---

Try to understand that my car is ~my~ property.

If you want to stop & search all cars before they enter your property, fine, get a warrant & do so.

Otherwise, live with Alaska's law, -- and with our nations 2nd amendment policy that says no infringements on our right to carry.



NRA pushes 'guns-at-work' bill in Florida
Address:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1499417/posts

[supercat]

I am pro 2A, but if someone doesn't want you bringing a gun onto their property, it should be their right.

There are already restrictions on what people may do with other people's vehicles on their property. If I put my car on your property without your permission, in most (all?) cities you are allowed to have it towed and impounded, generally for a price specified by the city. You are not allowed to confiscate property from the car or do anything to deliberately prevent me from redeeming my car, in the same condition and with the same contents as when it was towed, by payment of the legally-defined fee.

Do those restrictions infringe property owners' rights? Are you going to campaign against those?

[robertpaulsen]

"I am pro 2A, but if someone doesn't want you bringing a gun onto their property, it should be their right."

Then they assume responsibility for your safety, correct, and can be sued?