Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yarddog

"I am not a techician but never understood why there was that big of a problem serving rural areas. The towns have high speed at reasonable rates and they are basically the same distance from any really large urban areas as we are."

Its really more of a business problem than a technical problem. The towns have enough population density to make it worthwhile for cable companies to wire those areas.

If they want to serve the rural areas, they're faced with running a whole lotta cable for relatively few subscribers.

The telephone companies probably would have never run their cables out their either if it wasn't part of their compact w/ the gvt in return for a monopoly.


34 posted on 10/17/2005 10:55:11 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Pessimist

There is a technical component for the rural companies.....you aggregate DSL services on a D-Slam which the longest you can go from is around 12K feet for standard ADSL and 14K feet for SDSL.....many rural areas do not meet this standard....

NeverGore :^)


56 posted on 10/17/2005 11:43:42 AM PDT by nevergore (“It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson