" Which begs the question: If your interpretation is correct and (by necessity) Griswold is wrong, why do you support Miers for saying Griswold is correct?"
I have no idea what her reasoning is.
I believe the Griswold decsion striking down 53-32 and 54-196 was correct and thus I would be very disapointed in any justice who did not agree with it.
It would be very interesting to hear here reasoning.
I think you can pretty well assume that if she supports the Griswold decision she also supports its rationale.