Did you just skip over this part?
"but reconsideration under appropriate circumstances is also necessary."
No. That's my point. It is appropriate; it isn't appropriate; it is; it isn't..... She's not saying anything really. It's just the same verbal mosaic we got from Roberts that allows everyone to hear what they want to hear. Without clear examples of how they define these terms in actual cases -- A PAPER TRAIL -- we really know nothing more than we knew before she said these things. Ginsburg would say these things. Only, clearly Ginsburg thinks an appropriate circumstance is in a case like Lawrence vs. Texas that overturned recent (1986 I believe) precedent.