Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DMinus; doug from upland

My question is the same as yours...

doug---your thread said it was BAD for Hillary

but, this one says it is GOOD for Hillary....

Please, can you clear this up?


9 posted on 10/18/2005 6:31:20 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Please say a prayer, and hold positive thoughts for Texas Cowboy...and Faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Txsleuth

Each side can probably claim something. Clinton buys some more delays. The Appellate Court could have ordered that Hillary be removed as a defendant. They didn't. Now the Superior Court judge is going to have to address the anti-SLAPP motion again and this time use his discretion.


10 posted on 10/18/2005 6:36:20 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson