[[Bork didn't attack Roberts because Roberts was the most brilliant witness to ever testify before the judiciary committee.]]
Bork didn't attack Roberts because he knows Roberts could run circles around him.
We can all have disagreements over the Miers nomination, and time will tell who was on the correct side. But please, don't go around making idiotic comments like this one. Demonstrates that you have no clue about what you're talking about and diminishes any argument you would make. Like his personal opinions or not, Robert Bork is one of the most preeminent constitutional scholars presently breathing. While Roberts is brilliant in his own right, he would not "run circles around him," and it is preposterous to even suggest it.
That's Bork's point.