[1L]

>>flawed study by gun-loving economist John Lott<<

It'd be nice if this idiot would tell how the study is flawed rather than assert it is because he doesn't like the conclusion.

[freepatriot32]

yeah then he goes on an qoutes this little gem that has been debunked beyond a showdow of a doubt

and it’s well known that a gun is 43 times more likely to be used in killing its owner or a relative than an intruder.

[wolfpat]

He says it right in the same sentence: ...frequently debunked by a multitude of esteemed scholars and pro-gun criminologists.
Of course he doesn't name these so-called scholars or the studies that "confirm" these findings.

[kjo]

Evidence? Since when does a liberal gun-hater need evidence? It's all about "feeling". The guy "feels" guns are wrong so they're wrong. It's a simple world really. For liberals.

[arthurus]

The Communists used to introduce their more blatant lies in Pravda or the local Daily Worker with the phrase "As is well know..." or something similar.