Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/20/2005 10:51:20 AM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Crackingham; martin_fierro

Marteen, this has your name all over it...


2 posted on 10/20/2005 10:52:06 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

ping


6 posted on 10/20/2005 11:01:06 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/secondaryproblemsofsocialism.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham; pissant

I believe Ihave seen something like extreem teen. My understanding is all models are 18 or over.


9 posted on 10/20/2005 11:02:30 AM PDT by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
From the title, I was sure there would have been a kielbasa in the story somewhere.
20 posted on 10/20/2005 11:23:35 AM PDT by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 3catsanadog; agrace; annyokie; Asphalt; Atlantin; Ayn Rand wannabe; Badray; Benrand; ...

Zicari: JAGOFF
It's a 'Burgh


Thing.™

Click for Pittsburgh International, Pennsylvania Forecast
Send FReepmail if yunz want on/off BPT list, 'n'at
Learn Pittsburghese!
Free Streaming 'Burgh Radio
The List of Ping Lists

22 posted on 10/20/2005 11:27:44 AM PDT by martin_fierro (This week Tommy Maddox is on my s**t list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Wow, how awful. /sarc

Throw this perv in jail and throw away the key.

And for those of you who think obscenity is protected under the First Amendment, a brief refresher course in how this country used to be before the liberal courts of the 1960s decided that license and freedom were the same thing:

Chaplinsky vs. New Hampshire (1942):

"There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or 'fighting' words....It has been well observed that such utterances are no essential part of any exposition of ideas, and are of such slight social value as a step to truth that any benefit that may be derived from them is clearly outweighed by the social interest in order and morality."

Roth vs. The United States (1957)

"Obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected freedom of speech or press--either (1) under the First Amendment, as to the Federal Government, or (2) under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as to the States.... In the light of history, it is apparent that the unconditional phrasing of the First Amendment was not intended to protect every utterance.... The protection given speech and press was fashioned to assure unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people.... All ideas having even the slightest redeeming social importance--unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion--have the full protection of the guaranties, unless excludable because they encroach upon the limited area of more important interests; but implicit in the history of the First Amendment is the rejection of obscenity as utterly without redeeming social importance.

And lest we forget, from the Current Communist Goals read into the Congressional Record in 1963 by A. S. Herlong, Jr., Democrat representative from Florida:

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
24 posted on 10/20/2005 11:30:42 AM PDT by Antoninus (The greatest gifts parents can give their children are siblings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Porn world eyes Pittsburgh

From the headline I thought the article was going to be about the performance of our Steelers' quarterback last Sunday. To call it obscene would be an understatement.

28 posted on 10/20/2005 11:38:45 AM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Nina Hartley is quoted in the article defending Zicari. Here's an interesting tidbit that I came across not long ago about the veteran porn star and champion of everything transgrssive: Her parents were prominent of members of Gus Hall's Communist Party USA.


30 posted on 10/20/2005 11:51:52 AM PDT by beckett (Amor Fati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham; Petronski


FYI


36 posted on 10/20/2005 12:27:30 PM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
1 posted on 10/20/2005 1:51:20 PM EDT by Crackingham

Chip the ham! Don't crack the ham.

SD

42 posted on 10/20/2005 2:08:26 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

48 posted on 10/20/2005 3:14:00 PM PDT by Libloather (Geena Davis isn't man enough to play Hillary on TV. Heck, BILL isn't man enough to play Hillary...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson