Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 10/20/2005 6:10:47 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason:

Duplicate: Go to http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1506173/posts



Skip to comments.

The Hillary Election Fraud Conspiracy (concise and very easy to understand from HillCAP.org)
HillCAP.org ^ | 10-20-05 | USJF/PeterPaul/HillCAP

Posted on 10/20/2005 12:45:16 PM PDT by doug from upland

HillCAP.org

The Hillary Election Fraud Conspiracy: How Democrat leaders conspired with the Clintons to obtain millions in campaign contributions and hide it from the Feds

Key leaders of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), including DNC Chair Ed Rendell, DNC Convention and DNC Chair Terry McAuliffe, DNC California Regional Chair Stephanie Berger, and former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Harold Ickes, recruited businessman Peter Paul as a major donor to the DNC. They induced Paul to underwrite, host and produce fundraising events for the campaigns of Al Gore and Hillary Clinton in order to pursue his efforts to hire Bill Clinton when he left the White House. They then conspired with the Clintons to hide Paul's various contributions from the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and the public, and obstructed the Federal investigation that led to the indictment of David Rosen.

Peter Paul's contributions to Democratic campaigns included the following:

1. After discussing with Peter Paul how he might best form a business arrangement with Bill Clinton, DNC Chair Ed Rendell persuaded Paul to commit $150,000 in Stan Lee Media stock to the DNC for Al Gore's presidential campaign. This contribution was made directly through Rendell, and was never reported to the FEC as a Memorandum Contribution as required by law.

2. Paul also agreed to underwrite and produce Al Gore's first major Hollywood fundraiser, which was held at the Beverly Hills Hotel on June 8, 2000 and attended by some 200 people. Ed Rendell attended with Gore, but the DNC never reported the "in kind" contribution made by Paul in paying all the expenses for the event to the FEC as required by law. [See the invitation]

3. Under the direction of DNC Regional Chair Stephanie Berger, Peter Paul made $150,000 in improvements to his house between May and June, 2000, in preparation for Paul and his business partner Stan Lee to host a DNC fundraiser that featured President Clinton and included a Clinton sleepover at Paul's house.

4. Encouraged by Rendell and DNC Chair Terry McAuliffe, Paul also made a commitment to donate $150,000 in Stan Lee Media stock to Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign in order to host a VIP luncheon fund raiser for Hillary at Spago Restaurant on June 9, 2000. The event raised more than $20,000 in "hard money" for the campaign, including $2,000 from Paul's wife that has never been reported or returned. No Memorandum Contribution report of his commitment or any report of Paul's "in-kind" contribution of expenses for the luncheon fundraiser were ever filed with the FEC by Hillary's campaign.

5. Under the direction of DNC Regional Chair Stephanie Berger, Paul also underwrote the Gershman Tea Fundraiser for Hillary Clinton in Bel Air on June 9, 2000, an event attended by Hillary and her "friend" Susie Buell Thompson, Larry King, Melanie Griffith, Olivia Newton John, Morgan Fairchild, Sean Young, and many other celebrities. No report of Paul's "in-kind" contribution of expenses for the tea fund raiser were ever filed with the FEC by the DNC or Hillary's campaign.

6. With the encouragement of President Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Ed Rendell, Terrence McAuliffe, and Harold Ickes -- all of whom attended the event, Peter Paul produced and underwrote the Hollywood Gala Farewell to President Clinton fundraiser for Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign. See Clinton Campaign Magic: Making a Scandal Disappear for more information on this event.

7. Rendell, Bill and Hillary Clinton persuaded Paul not to publicly contradict false statements that Hillary's Senate campaign made to the media regarding Paul's relationship with Hillary, Bill and the campaign. Rendell called Paul twice, on August 15 and 17, after stories in the Washington Post quoted a Hillary spokesman misrepresenting Paul's role in the campaign and the contributions he made in three separate fundraisers. Both Clintons wrote glowing personal letters to Paul on August 18, two days after permitting their spokesman to disparage Paul in the Post, as a message to Paul to go along with their deceptions in order to preserve his multi-million dollar investment in their relationship.

8. DNC officials laundered Stan Lee's $100,000 contribution to Hillary’s campaign through the NY Senate 2000 Committee so that Hillary could pay the down payment to Gala concert producer Gary Smith. Stan Lee testified under oath in a deposition in February, 2005 that he never intended to make any contribution to the NY Senate 2000 Committee or Hillary's campaign, he merely borrowed $100,000 for that purpose from Stan Lee Media at Peter Paul's request on July 28, 2000, and that when the loan was due to be paid in November, 2000 to Stan Lee Media, Stan Lee made the payment by trading checks for $100,000 with Paul, normally a serious violation of election laws.

9. Rendell and Clinton staffers continued working through October to keep Paul "on the reservation" until after the election. They failed to show Paul the campaign's fraudulent October 15 report to the FEC, which hid Paul as Hillary's largest contributor, and avoided asking Paul for any accounting or designation of his donative intent. By so doing, they conspired to have Paul aid and abet their fraudulent FEC report.

10. Starting on August 15, 2000, Hillary Clinton led a coverup of her own actions, those of President Clinton, and those of DNC leaders regarding the contributions of Peter Paul. The Clintons induced Paul to aid and abet Hillary's false statements to the media and the FEC, and caused three false reports to be filed with the FEC that intentionally hid the identity of her largest contributor and the true amount of his contributions. Even after being served with a civil suit, a demand letter, an FEC complaint, the publication of syndicated news columns by Robert Novak, and an ABC 20/20 expose detailing Paul's allegations, Hillary, her campaign Treasurer Grossman, and her lawyer David Kendall all continued the coverup by causing a third fraudulent report to be filed on July 30, 2001. This false report was filed in direct response to a specific FEC inquiry regarding the accounting of the Hollywood Gala

Since that time, Hillary has deflected any accountability from herself, Bill Clinton and her Finance Treasurer, Andrew Grossman, by misleading Federal Investigators during the investigation that led to the indictment of David Rosen. Ed Rendell, now the Governor of Pennsylvania, has misrepresented his role in these events to the media. Terry McAuliffe misrepresented his own actions to Justice Department officials to whom Paul had detailed McAuliffe's role. The Rosen jury ruled that David Rosen was not culpable for the fraudulent FEC reports filed by Hillary Clinton's campaign, because he had no legal duty to make any reports and in fact did not sign any reports to the FEC. This decision in no way alters the uncontested fact that three FEC reports made by Hillary's 2000 Senate campaign were in fact fraudulent. They remain uncorrected, and the illegal contribution omitted from those reports of more than $1.2 million, according to the FBI, has not been refunded as required by law.

Further investigation by the Justice Department and the Senate Ethics Committee is required to determine the full extent to which Hillary's campaign and DNC leaders may have misled federal investigators and obstructed justice.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; hillaryscandals; hillcap; hillpac; peterpaul
Hillary has never paid a price for the crime that was committed in broad daylight.
1 posted on 10/20/2005 12:45:17 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Where are the US Attorneys? What is stopping them from going after the beast and the democrat leadership?


2 posted on 10/20/2005 12:48:38 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Hillary has never paid a price for ANY crime she has committed day or night. But her day is coming. Nobody escapes Divine justice!


3 posted on 10/20/2005 12:48:42 PM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (My Homeland Security: Isaiah 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

How about lots of jail time for these people.


4 posted on 10/20/2005 12:49:26 PM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Would you like to do something? It's your choice --- sit back a whine that nothing will ever happen or try to do something to make it happen.

http://ethics.senate.gov/
Perhaps Robert Walker would like to hear from you at the US SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS

202.224.2981.

5 posted on 10/20/2005 12:50:41 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Hillary's Fund-Raiser

Back to the HRC Page

Yahoo! News

Thursday June 28 01:00 AM EDT
By Robert Novak

WASHINGTON -- On March 30 in Newark, N.J., lawyers from the conservative Judicial Watch organization met representatives of four U.S. attorneys with an offer in behalf of an unusual client. Peter Paul, a colorful Hollywood entrepreneur under Justice Department investigation for stock manipulation, would give information to prosecutors if he could return briefly from Sao Paulo, Brazil, without fear of arrest. Included was his claimed contribution, unreported to federal authorities, of nearly $2 million to Sen. Hillary Clinton's 2000 campaign.

Intellivu
More Editorial Columns at Intellivu.com

 

Two months of silence was broken June 12 when Alan Vinegrad, acting U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn), brought a securities fraud indictment against Paul. No interest was shown in the proffer.

The Clinton administration pattern appears to be continuing in the Bush administration. Donors, not recipients, of specious political contributions are prosecuted.

The Justice Department was never informed of the Paul proffer by the four U.S. attorneys, who are all holdover Clinton political appointees or interim civil servants. Judicial Watch's Larry Klayman has brought the case to Bush appointees at Main Justice. But Attorney General John Ashcroft, after his brutal confirmation, shows great deference to non-Bush U.S. attorneys. The inclination is to "move on" rather than pursue the Clintons.

Nevertheless, a lawsuit filed by Paul in Los Angeles June 19 against Bill and Hillary Clinton paints a picture all too familiar in American political fund-raising generally and by the Clintons particularly.

Paul in 1998 co-founded Stan Lee Media, Inc. (SLM) with Stan Lee, creator of "Spiderman," "The Incredible Hulk" and other comic book characters. He claims he wanted President Clinton to honor Lee, but associates say Paul really sought the president as a business partner after he left office. What better way to woo him than by helping Mrs. Clinton get elected?

Court papers show Paul claiming he "spent approximately $1.9 million of his own personal funds" paying vendors for a lavish Hollywood "tribute" last Aug. 12 that raised a net $1.5 million for Mrs. Clinton's candidacy. Campaign finance lawyers see law violations in neither reporting this money nor reimbursing Paul.

"Generally, we don't comment on Judicial Watch activities," Clinton spokesman Jim Kennedy told me. The Clinton FEC filing shows a $500,000 "in-kind" contribution by SLM, but actually, the company gave nothing. Paul's cancelled checks substantiate his $1.9 million unreported contribution.

Help for Mrs. Clinton's campaign was not all that Paul promised. The court filing asserts that in return for a one-year commitment to work for SLM once the president left office, Paul last July offered him $10 million in SLM stock, $5 million in cash and $1 million for the Clinton library. Paul alleges that Chicago businessman Jim Levin conveyed this offer to the White House and returned with a perquisite package including a Lincoln bedroom stay and a Camp David weekend. Levin did not respond to my phone calls.

On Aug. 14, Washington Post columnist Lloyd Grove reported that Paul spent 30 months in federal prison after a 1979 conviction for trying to swindle Fidel Castro's government and cocaine possession. Mrs. Clinton's campaign immediately returned $2,000 directly contributed by Paul and his wife but ignored the $1.9 million.

The suit contends Paul was assured by Clinton's emissaries that nothing had been changed. Indeed, flowery thank-you letters from the Clintons were written after the Aug. 16 return of $2,000 ("With gratitude for friendship," Mrs. Clinton wrote on Aug. 18 in a note signed "Hillary").

After this experience, Paul asserts, he sought a presidential pardon into September. Democratic Party General Chairman Ed Rendell said "he was working on it," the suit alleges. Rendell told me his appointment book reflects no meeting with Paul that late in the year. "I can't recall any talk about a pardon," Rendell added.

Paul talked to me from Brazil this week, under the stipulation not to discuss his indictment. Did he really think spending all that money for Hillary Clinton's campaign would entice her husband into his firm? "I wonder if I was taken, and that's why this lawsuit was filed," he replied. The question now is whether Paul will get what is known as a "queen for a day" arrest-free visit to tell his story to prosecutors -- if they want to listen.

© 2001 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Copyright © 2001 Yahoo! Inc


6 posted on 10/20/2005 12:56:58 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
US ATTORNEY, SOUTHERN DISTRICT NEW YORK
7 posted on 10/20/2005 12:59:21 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

Ping


8 posted on 10/20/2005 1:03:33 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
"Hillary has never paid a price for the crime that was committed in broad daylight."

uh, Which??????????????

Our next president will surely have revenge on her mind...

9 posted on 10/20/2005 1:05:32 PM PDT by NameItClaimIt (Birkenstocks, Subarus, and Tree-hugging)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NameItClaimIt

I know. I may have to change my last name of fromupland to fromthebahamas.


10 posted on 10/20/2005 1:08:11 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
The inclination is to "move on" rather than pursue the Clintons.

And no good deed goes unpunished. Why must the Republicans accept door mat status?

11 posted on 10/20/2005 1:08:24 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

We knew it right after the inauguration in 2000 that President Bush was making a big mistake by not putting a stake in the vampire's heart.


12 posted on 10/20/2005 1:10:00 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
We knew it right after the inauguration in 2000 that President Bush was making a big mistake by not putting a stake in the vampire's heart.

I was too slow to see that. To my shame, I didn't object to 'move on' for two more years.

13 posted on 10/20/2005 1:15:04 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All

14 posted on 10/20/2005 1:29:57 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I am delighted that FReepers can now see the larger picture that none of the media wants understood. My involvement with the DNC was not limited to underwriting one fundraiser for Hillary, albeit her biggest and most expensive. I was cajoled, induced and coerced to become Hillary's largest contributor by TWO DNC Chairmen as well as the Democrat President, who conspired to hide my contributions and mislead the federal investigation that ensued. They directed the investigation so it landed squarely on David Rosen's shoulders, hoping to use him as a fall guy to shelter all of their misconduct. The jury didn't buy that scenario and refused to have Rosen swing alone for the actions and omissions of his superiors in the Clinton campaign.

The issue of almost greater concern, as reflected in this Robert Novak article of June 28, 2001, is that I presented all the information used to indict Rosen, directly to Attorney General Ashcroft on June 22, 2001, and in a proffer to the then head of the Criminal Division of the Justice Dept., Michael Chertoff and his staff on June 28, 2001. Then, in August and October, 2001, after I was prevented from returning to the US voluntarily in August, 2001, I spent four days in Brazil in proffers to the chief trial attorney for Michael Chertoff's office, Bruce Ohr, and the lead investigator of the Inspector General's Office, William Johnston, who made two trips to Brazil to see me.

On November 22, 2001, 59,874 petitions were delivered to Ashcroft's office from my supporters who demanded I be allowed to return to the US to present my allegations against the Clintons. Rather than allow me to return voluntarily, with some assurances I would be allowed bail to protect myself and my family, I was held for 2 1/2 years in Brazilian dungeons enabling the Clinton's to dismiss my first civil suit against them, buying them 3 years before my return to the US and refiling of my case.

Rosen was indicted secretly in December, 2003, after the publicity surrounding my new civil suit against the Clintons. His indictment was not unsealed until January, 2005, the same week Ashcroft left office and after Chertoff was appointed to the Appellate Court, before being appointed Chief of Homeland security.

Freepers should question the motives of those that are charged with enforcing the laws fairly and equally to all in our democracy.
15 posted on 10/20/2005 1:49:08 PM PDT by krucader_bravepages_com (the mother of all whistleblowers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

BTTT


16 posted on 10/20/2005 1:56:10 PM PDT by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krucader_bravepages_com

I just phoned the Dept. of Homeland Security and asked for the press office. I was hoping to get an answer regarding why Mr. Chertoff did not act when presented evidence regarding Hillary Clinton on June 28, 2001. Sure, they will have someone get back to me.


17 posted on 10/20/2005 1:58:35 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; Alamo-Girl

Ping


18 posted on 10/20/2005 3:04:28 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Ping


19 posted on 10/20/2005 3:09:48 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

bttt


20 posted on 10/20/2005 3:10:47 PM PDT by bmwcyle (We broke Pink's Code and found a terrorist message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson