i dont need an article, i cited the passage from his own book.
[[i dont need an article, i cited the passage from his own book.]]
The article sited your passage from his book and more that you conveniently left out. Taking only your passage was misleading, if not outright dishonest. There is no mistaking Bork is anti-Second Amendment, he regards it as a states right, not an individual right. Amusing you refuse to admit you are wrong when confronted with the facts.