Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political Virus (WSJ Editorial)
WSJ ^

Posted on 10/21/2005 10:06:44 PM PDT by indianrightwinger

Political Virus October 22, 2005; Page A6

Our political leaders keep telling us to fear the avian flu, and in one sense they're right: We should all be scared to death about how much damage our political leaders will do responding to the avian flu.

Consider Secretary General Kofi Annan, who declared this month that he hoped concern for "intellectual property" wouldn't "get into the way" of procuring widespread vaccines for a potential avian-flu outbreak. In other words, companies that make vaccines should abandon their patents at Mr. Annan's whim. This kind of hostility to property rights is precisely the reason we now have a shortage of vaccines and drugs to combat this potential pandemic.

No one really knows how great the avian flu threat is. Public-health officials have been warning about it ever since new studies suggested that the infamous 1918 flu outbreak originated in birds. Warning is what these folks get paid to do. Other experts argue that 1918 was a fluke and that the current avian virus is unlikely to become a mass killer of humans.

Whatever the risk, some good will come out of this public alarm if we use it as an opportunity to understand why the U.S. is now so poorly armed to cope with a deadly flu outbreak. The reason is that our political class has spent the past 30 years driving the vaccine industry out of business with its own virus of over-regulation, price controls, litigation and intellectual-property abuse.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: avian; birdflu; flu; politics; senate; virus
Ried sponsored and won a $3B spending measure in the Senate.
1 posted on 10/21/2005 10:06:45 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

Fund is right that we have to keep an eye on this. OTOH, there's no way that Roche could produce even enough Tamiflu for the US market with its current facilities if an outbreak occurred. SOunds like Lindsay Graham did the right thing on this one, and so did Roche.


2 posted on 10/21/2005 10:33:33 PM PDT by I8NY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
In their first venture into socialized medicine, the Clintons destroyed the vaccine business in the U.S.

In one fell swoop, vaccines became a "single-source" industry selling to a "single payer" -- the federal government.

In turn, the single customer set the price and restricted the quantitities they would buy. The result was to drive most suppliers out of the business...and overseas.

Now, the vaccines available are the cheapest available, to be sure -- but there is never enough, nor are they the proper (or even the best) varieties.

A case study in what National Health Care would become...

3 posted on 10/21/2005 10:41:07 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

But, bashing pharmas always works.

Shame. Even a major health disaster won't make people realize the idiocy of the policies. They will blame the vaccine makers even more.


4 posted on 10/21/2005 10:46:33 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson