Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ez

Conservatives have always held heretofore that religion should NOT be a basis for qualification.

In Miers, they're now turning that on its head to gather support from conservatives.

Just because someone calls themself a Christian, or a lawyer, does not make them a qualified judge. There are all kinds of Christians, and lawyers.....and many are democrats and/or liberals.


180 posted on 10/22/2005 7:40:10 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]


To: nicmarlo
Conservatives have always held heretofore that religion should NOT be a basis for qualification.

I disagree 100 percent, it is the LEFT that tries to remove religion from the public square. It is Bush who again gave voice to faith-based organizations working with government and religion freely expressed. The President is perfectly within his right making a religious background a qualification for his nominee.

You know the Founders were religious men, and the Constitution DOES recognize that our rights come from God. What's wrong with a nominee that recognizes those facets of public life, and will support them?

What's wrong with picking a person whose strong moral code might be as much of a benefit to the Court as another persons 25 years in Constitutional Law?

187 posted on 10/22/2005 7:47:41 AM PDT by ez (No more pointy-headed intellectuals on the Supreme Court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson