ACLU allied with porn industry?

Worldnet Daily ^ | October 22, 2005 | James L. Lambert

[Dante3]

ACLU is a truly perverted organization. Bill O'Reilly and Wendy Murphy are among the relatively few people in the media who I have heard speak out against it.

[Dante3]

ACLU also goes into frenzy over religion - they sure hate prayer of any kind and the Ten Commandments.

[catmanblack.]

how many times have AMERICANS raised hell im public about this-is it not time to keep our children from becoming prey-is it not time to say enough is enough-DAMN THOSE THAT ABUSE AND USE SEX AS AN EXCUSE-AMERICA THE POLICE WILL NEVER STOP IT THE JUDGES AND LAWYERS WILL DO NOTHING-is it time to start kicking ass and taking names-if we do nothing we are damned to loose a generation-like we have already lost in the past-

[Dante3]

ACLU sure acts like it.

[pointsal]

Situation normal , just...

AFU!

[Dante3]

True.

[Liberty Wins]

EXCLUSIVE ACLU AREA IN HELL NEARLY COMPLETE

Preparations for an ACLU-only area in Hell are nearly complete, underground construction sources said yesterday. The area, more than 3 square miles of "hotter than usual" turf, will hold members of the American Civil Liberties Union, an organization whose sole objective has become the elimination of Christmas.

"There's a mini-volcano there burping up hot lava and everything," said an anonymous representative of Otherwordly Construction, Inc. The company recently sold its soul to the devil for the exclusive, no-bid offer of expanding Hell. A feature story in an upcoming issue of Architectural Digest will reveal the exclusive area of Hell for ACLU members.

The construction project is believed to be the first known addition to Hell since the 1940s, when Nazi and Japanese war criminals headed for their eternal damnation en masse. An anonymous spokesman for the construction company worried that "Hell may too good for these folks. When they move down here property values are just going to hit rock bottom. And when their neighbors find out 40,000 lawyers are living next door, this place is really going to explode. It's going to get pretty hot, let me tell you."

Analysts estimate the ACLU expansion of Hell increases 10 square feet for every nativity scene protested and 5 square feet for every time someone is forced to say "Happy Winter Solstice" instead of "Merry Christmas."

ACLU members working on removing "God" from the Pledge of Allegiance and U.S. coinage can expect their own separate inferno.

Otherworldly Construction says their next project will be the judges' condominium, Endless Torment Terrace. Nothing special, according to the builders, just the regulation fiery pit accomodations.

[Burlem]

bump

[katya8]

The ACLU has always been abuser-protective......!

[Obeyhiscommands05]

Thanks for the link I was wondering if there was an agency that has a campiagn against the ACLU.

[gitmo]

Say someone hires two hookers to have sex with one another...

How about this scenario: For a hundred bucks you can enroll in our "acting class". You can even perform in one of our "plays". If you are the shy type, we have "modern operas", but you will have to wear a mask.

[SandRat]

Nope! Came across it here on FR and saved it off for later use.

[Spirited]

May the "God of all flesh" reward the organization as a whole and its' individual membership accordingly.

[Old Seadog]

"I get so freakin' mad..."

[calrighty]

AND WE DO LITTLE OR NOTHING TO STOP THEM.

[willyboyishere]

"Say someone hires two hookers to have sex with each other.
Is that prostitution or art?

---

Neither. It's commerce. It's precisely the modus operandi of a producer of porn films.

[Panic in the Streets]

There used to be a time when the feminist crowd was against porn...until Larry Flynt came to the defense of the sexual harasser and rapist.

[Simon666]

Now let's look at the facts instead:

In 1982, the ACLU became involved in a case involving the distribution of child pornography (New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 [15].) In a controversial amicus brief, the ACLU argued that the New York State law in question "has criminalized the dissemination, sale or display of constitutionally protected non-obscene materials which portray juveniles in sexually related roles", while arguing that child pornography deemed obscene under the Miller test deserved no constitutional protection and could be banned [16]. The ACLU's stance on this case has drawn great criticism from conservatives [17]. In a 2002 letter, the ACLU stated that it "opposes child pornography that uses real children in its depictions" [18]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_Liberties_Union

Now what is the Miller test:

The Miller test was developed in the 1973 case Miller v. California. It has three parts: *Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, *Whether the work depicts/describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law, *Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

The third condition is also known as the SLAPS test. The work is considered obscene only if all three conditions are satisfied.

So the truth content of Reisman's claim that the ACLU "legalized simulated intercourse, real intercourse, lewd conduct ... with children" is just about zero and the WND article just another rightwing attack at the ACLU.