Posted on 10/22/2005 8:15:54 PM PDT by Ethan_Allen1777
Despite the claims of anti-smoking groups that research studies have conclusively proved that secondhand tobacco smoke causes lung cancer, the city councils of Arlington Heights, Evanston and Wheeling rejected smoking bans. The three Illinois municipalities have created significant restaurant industries that play an important role in their economies, and the council members concluded that the risks of loss of businesses were not worth the health benefits that some claimed would result from a ban on smoking.
Now the Chicago City Council is considering banning smoking in virtually all restaurants, bars and commercial buildings.
Anti-smoking groups with a collectivist political agenda, allied with "cancer industry" organizations that rely on fear to enhance their considerable cash flow, have filled the media with claims about secondhand tobacco smoke that are questionable at best, and fraudulent at worst. It's important to look past their shrill propaganda and examine their claims without bias.
The keystone of their argument for banning indoor smoking is that exposure to "secondhand" smoke is a serious health hazard that causes lung cancer. To hear them tell it, there simply is no debate: Studies conclusively have shown a causal connection between lung cancer and secondhand tobacco smoke. In fact, the research studies tell a different story -- a story that largely has been ignored by the media.
A study often cited by anti-smoking groups is the 1993 study by Michael Siegel, "Involuntary Smoking in the Restaurant Workplace," published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which declared that non-smoking restaurant workers have a 50 percent higher risk of lung cancer than the general population. However, a peer review of the study completed in 2000, authored by Martha Perske, revealed that the claimed 50 percent increased risk was based on six studies that had absolutely nothing to do with secondhand smoke in restaurants, bars, or anywhere else.
Small increased risks for lung cancer were found in food service workers, but there was no evidence in any of the six studies that food service workers had been exposed to tobacco smoke!
According to Michael Fumento, writing in Health Care News, in 2003 professors James Enstrom of UCLA and Geoffrey Kabat of the State University of New York reported in the British Medical Journal that their 39-year study of 35,561 Californians who had never smoked showed no causal relationship between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco-related mortality.
Fumento also reports that in 1999, an Environmental Health Perspectives survey of 17 studies of environmental tobacco smoke and heart disease found only five that were statistically significantly positive. And in 2002, an analysis of 48 studies of environmental tobacco smoke found only 10 studies that were significantly positive, one that was significantly negative, and 37 that were not significant in either direction.
Fumento adds that in 1975, when many more individuals smoked in restaurants, cocktail lounges and transportation lounges, the concentration of tobacco smoke then was equivalent to 0.004 cigarettes an hour -- a very small amount.
Despite the claim of anti-smoking groups that scientific studies unanimously have shown that secondhand smoke is killing thousands from lung cancer, the truth is that the vast majority of such studies failed to find any statistically significant link.
The arguments of anti-smokers are sometimes ludicrous. They claim that smoke contains 4,000 poisons and carcinogens, but a 2005 California EPA analysis found only 405. Not only that, the average American diet contains about 10,000 poisons and carcinogens. Perhaps Chicago should ban food instead of tobacco.
Dennis Constant is director of research for the Chicago-based Illinois Taxpayer Education Foundation.
Science that does not support the conclusions of the PC crowd will be ignored/buried.
ping
You may find this interesting and / or useful
BTTT
I would be willing to bet the reason there is a higher incident of lung cancer among food service workers is that most of them smoke.
Studies shmudies. Facts are for losers.
The important thing is that we've all been told thousands of times how bad second-hand smoke is by someone who knows better than us how we should live our lives. Repetition makes right, so hand over the smokes and the rest of your civil rights while you're at it.
yes.. good stuff
I don't care whether second hand smoke causes cancer or not. I'm glad I don't have to breathe it in the building where I work or in restaurants.
Bump...
Tobacco makes a great natural insecticide. It also is used as a natural dewormer in aminals.
Imagine the wonders it does for your health!
TLR
Tobacco makes a great natural insecticide. It also is used as a natural dewormer in aminals.
Imagine the wonders it does for your health!
TLR
Our ancestors up until the second half of the 20th were exposed to second hand smoke from heating and cooking with wood and coal, and lighting with oil lamps almost all of their lives.... And the population just kept growing and growing.
Mike Royko is spinning in his grave.
My great uncle used to brag how he would take a chaw and then give one to the horse, and the horse never had worms.(And probably neither did he).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.