Posted on 10/23/2005 3:45:57 PM PDT by RWR8189
They consider themselves to be above the law. Without honor, they disregard the legal rights of owners.
You know what I'm talking about.
We need to get a prescription now for ropes and knives?
Oh, please. I'm not interested.
Put me down for a no.
?
Have the last four years on FR just been a bizzare dream of mine?
It's a technical no. Poorly phrased question.
How could the poll be more accurately questioned? Does it have to do with the "expansion" part? That had me thinking over it a bit myself.
"[T]he New Deal Court’s own constitutional justification for its radical expansion of the scope of federal power over commerce was that the congressional measures in question were valid exercises of the power granted by the Necessary and Proper Clause and were not direct exercises of the power to regulate commerce among the several states. That is, the Court did not simply and directly enlarge the scope of the Commerce Clause itself, as is often believed. Rather, it upheld various federal enactments as necessary and proper means to achieve the legitimate objective of regulating interstate commerce."
-- Stephen Gardbaum, Rethinking Constitutional Federalism, 74 Tex. L. Rev. 795, 807-08, 1996
You and Sarah Brady equate firearms with drugs, tpaine. Not me.
But tpaine did.
OK, so where is the best thread on the decision in Gonzalez vs Oregon?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.