To: feyler; NavVet
Why are they trashing Miller? Is it because they think she's the one in trouble? If she had the goods on Rove and Libby they wouldn't be doing this. I say stay tuned. 11 posted on 10/25/2005 10:42:12 AM MDT by feyler
I think she is going to indited and they want to distance themselves from her!
14 posted on
10/25/2005 9:47:16 AM PDT by
Uri’el-2012
(Y'shua <==> YHvH is my Salvation (Psalm 118-14))
To: XeniaSt
indited ===>>>indicted
16 posted on
10/25/2005 9:58:10 AM PDT by
Uri’el-2012
(Y'shua <==> YHvH is my Salvation (Psalm 118-14))
To: XeniaSt
I don't know. It might be wishful thinking to believe that the chatter on this is because there won't be indictments (and the libs want to try to pile on to get as much of an appearance of guilt as possible) or that Miller or Cooper will be indicted (not likely because she wasn't the focus). But I just don't see how Fitz can justify an indictment on (we are presuming) flimsy memory in a case with no underlying crime.
27 posted on
10/25/2005 10:34:47 AM PDT by
AmishDude
(If Miers isn't qualified, neither are you and you have no right to complain about any SC decision.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson