Time for 'Scooter' to Scoot (An oldie - on Libby's Marc Rich connection)

Newsmax ^ | March, 2001 | John L. Perry

[churchillbuff]

Freepers (including Churchillbuff) howled when Clinton pardoned Marc Rich. Libby is tight with Rich -- but are freepers now defending Libby? Not Churchillbuff!

[churchillbuff]

The story of Clinton's
Marc Rich pardon
Co-conspirators serve time while multimillionaire enjoys clemency

---

By Timothy P. Carney
© 2001 Human Events

He wasn't born Rich. No, he was born Marc David Reich in Belgium in 1934 to a working-class Jewish father. Fearing the Nazis, his family fled to America in 1942, changed their name to Rich and tried to start life all over again.

Forty-one years later, Marc Rich was fleeing again, but this time the feared authority was not Adolph Hitler, but the assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Morris (Sandy) Weinberg. Rich's crimes included tax evasion, fraud and "trading with the enemy" -- Iran, during the hostage crisis.

Rich, by now a multimillionaire, was in Switzerland on the day his indictment came down and decided to stay. Once again, Rich started his life afresh, leaving his old wife Denise for a young blond model, changing the name of one of his Swiss firms and starting a new business.

On Jan. 20, President Clinton gave Rich a chance for a third "do-over." Clinton wiped all the criminal charges off of Rich's record with a presidential pardon on his last day in power. The Rich pardon has received special attention because Denise Rich raised and donated more than $1 million to the Democratic Party in recent years and also provided the Clintons directly with a $10,000 contribution to their legal defense fund and $7,300 worth of furniture.

Even left-wing newspapers and columnists have rebuked Clinton for pardoning Rich. Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., declared himself "troubled." Bush White House lawyers looked into overturning the pardon, and House Government Reform Committee Chairman Dan Burton, R-Ind., has launched an investigation.

The strange case started with the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973, which established a system of price controls on crude oil produced in or imported to the United States. In 1980 and '81, the Energy Department classified oil that came from wells that produce 10 barrels a day or less as "stripper" oil and exempted it from the price caps.

According to his 1983 indictment, Rich saw this regulation as a potential gold mine, setting up a scam to have his company's oil relabeled "stripper" oil by a reseller, and thus seemingly exempted from the price controls.

To hide this activity and the illegal profits it produced, says Sandy Weinberg, the lead prosecutor in the case, Rich allegedly had a reseller claim Rich's profits were really its own and then hand over the money through sham transactions to companies Rich controlled in Panama.

This led the government to charge Rich and his partner Pincus Green with fraud and the evasion of $42 million in taxes.

On top of that, Weinberg alleges, Rich bought crude oil from the Ayatollah Khomeini's Iran while Iran was holding U.S. citizens hostage. This was in direct violation of a U.S. trade embargo -- and, in effect, helped to arm the Iranians by giving them needed cash.

Bring all of these activities together into a concerted effort to make illegal profits, and you've got what the prosecutor called racketeering -- violating federal criminal statutes designed for busting the Mafia.

Rich's attorneys -- at the time of the investigation as well as in the consideration of the pardon -- uttered cries of "over-prosecution." They hoped an agreement could be reached. Rich's and Green's attorney, Edward Bennett Williams, met with Weinberg a few times in 1983 to offer a deal: The companies would pay $100 million if all charges were dropped.

This was on top of the $50,000 per day that Marc Rich was paying in contempt-of-court fines for not turning over certain documents. Every Friday, Rich paid $200,000, and every Monday, $150,000. The payments eventually equaled $21 million.

Rich started paying the fines only after the feds, following an anonymous tip, "reeled in a plane on the runway at JFK" (Weinberg's words) and found it was carrying a paralegal from a New York law firm who had checked on board with two steamer trunks full of subpoenaed documents.

The plane was on its way to Europe.

Weinberg recounts a June 1983 meeting with Williams, in which Williams put his feet up on the prosecutor's desk and made the pitch. In Weinberg's view, and in the view of his boss, then-U.S. Attorney Rudy Giuliani, Rich and Green deserved nothing short of jail time. If wealthy criminals could buy their way out of their misdeeds, the prosecutors felt, then they were effectively above the law.

Rich and Green, according to a few sources, were in Europe at the time of the negotiation. When Weinberg told Bennett, "No deal," the two businessmen decided not to come back. Three months later, a federal grand jury handed down an indictment for fraud, tax evasion and trading with the enemy.

The resellers who were the main co-conspirators in the "stripper oil" fraud were convicted and served 12 months in jail. Rich's companies pleaded guilty to 78 counts and paid over $150 million, while Rich and Green remained fugitives. Attempts at extradition failed.

That did not mean that they could not profit off the U.S. government. As then-Rep. Bob Wise, D-W.Va, unearthed in hearings in the early 1990s, while Rich was a fugitive the U.S. mint was contracting to buy metal from one of his companies.

Between fiscal years 1989 and 1992, the mint issued at least 21 separate contracts for nickel, zinc and copper to the company. Also, in 1988, the Defense Logistics Agency lifted its bar on contracting with the same company.

Wise characterized the scandal of dealing with the fugitive Rich this way: "I wonder how the average American taxpayer feels when they go to the shopping center and they reach into their pockets to pull out some change, some coins to pay the sales tax, which they are obligated to pay. And as they pull out that change and put those coins on the desk, they find that the person who provided the metal to the mint and is benefiting is accused of evading the very taxes that the citizen is paying. I don't think that sits very well with the American taxpayer."

But President Clinton completely ignored standard procedures in finally pardoning Rich. His action bypassed the Justice Department and blindsided Mary Jo White, the U.S. attorney who serves in the district formerly presided over by Giuliani.

Various lawyers had tried to get White to accept a plea-bargain from Rich for years. One of these lawyers, according to the New Yorker, was Lewis Libby, now chief of staff to Vice President Cheney. (Cheney's office did not return calls on the matter.)

But when Jack Quinn, Clinton's former White House counsel, took Rich as a client, things changed. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, the Anti-Defamation League and, of course, mega-fundraiser Denise Rich all submitted letters directly to Clinton, through Quinn, requesting a pardon.

Burton and Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., now intend to investigate how the pardon came about. Did Clinton do it out of the kindness of his heart, or was there another consideration?

[Perdogg]

Typical GOP thinking, throw someone under the bus.

[churchillbuff]

The Rich pardon
by Joe Farah

---

© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com


Some people in Congress are shocked -- shocked, I tell you -- to find out that money may have been buying personal favors in the Clinton White House.

Therefore, Congress is set to hold investigative hearings this week into the possibility of Clinton administration corruption.

I know what you are thinking. Where were these guys when we needed them? Well, it gets worse.

The hearings to be held in the House and Senate are to focus on Clinton's 11th-hour pardon of fugitive commodities trader Marc Rich.

There's no doubt Rich is a scoundrel. He fled the country and renounced his citizenship when faced with a 65-count indictment for conspiracy, tax evasion and trading with the enemy. He was convicted in absentia on 51 counts.

It also appears obvious that Clinton pardoned Rich as a quid pro quo for hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions funneled to Hillary Clinton, Al Gore and other Democratic Party candidates.

I suppose I should be thankful that some members of Congress have awakened finally to the depths of blatant Clinton administration corruption. But I can't help feeling that these inquiries are way too little, way too late.

Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., is leading one of the probes. Think about that irony. Specter bent over backwards, citing Scottish law, in his intellectual and legal gymnastics attempting to explain why he was voting against convicting Clinton during the impeachment trial.

His vote came after his wife got an appointment to the Clinton administration. And he's going to judge whether Clinton took a bribe to pardon Rich?

Many of us out here in America -- outside of Washington, D.C. -- couldn't understand why the Congress failed to investigate Clinton administration corruption adequately during the last eight years. It was as if Congress had abdicated its oversight role and forgotten that it represented, at least, a co-equal branch of government with the executive -- and, more importantly, the people's voice in the federal system.

It seems like odd timing to begin worrying about Clinton now that he's gone.

And bribery will be a tough case to make -- no matter how obvious it appears to any of us. If Congress couldn't convict Clinton on perjury during impeachment, does anyone really expect anything but some hot air from these hearings?

Furthermore, as much as I hate to say it, the Constitution does give the president wide berth on the issue of pardons. There's no need for approval by Congress or anyone else.

You see, Congress had its chance. Most members -- even in the Senate -- knew what Clinton was when they voted on impeachment. They knew he was corrupt. They knew he was a criminal. They knew he had repeatedly broken the public trust. They knew he had no respect for the law. They knew he believed only in himself and what was good for Bill Clinton. They knew he had no scruples, no conscience, no ethics, no morality. They knew if he got away with perjury and much more serious crimes for which he wasn't impeached, that he would continue his criminal escapades.

Well, guess what? Clinton did just that. And the Rich pardon was only the latest insult added to many injuries Bill Clinton inflicted on America's body politic.

I wish Congress well in investigating the Rich affair. The American public does deserve to know the truth. The problem is that Congress has been woefully ineffective in such half-hearted investigations during the Clinton years. So, my hopes that justice will be served and that the public will be informed are somewhat dim, to say the least.

I'm just trying to figure out where all this outrage is coming from at this late date. Where was the outrage when Clinton was selling national security down the drain for Chinese political campaign contributions? Don't they get it? After eight years, don't these people understand Clinton would sell anything that wasn't nailed down to anyone with money in his hand?

Like any other red-blooded American, I'd like to see Marc Rich pay for his crimes. But that's not going to happen. More importantly, I'd like to see Bill Clinton -- and all those around him who were complicit in their guilt -- pay for the pattern of official criminal activity of the last eight years.

Too bad, but I just don't think Congress has the stomach for it.

[TommyDale]

This is the first time I have read of a Marc Rich / Lewis Libby connection. If this is true, I have no sympathy. Throw him under the bus for all I care.

[gondramB]

The 17 year figure is interesting . Rich was indicted by Guiliani in 1983 - that would be 22 years ago. He fled to Switzerland that same year.

Does that mean Libby started representing him after he was already a fugitive for trading with Iran during the hostage crisis? Or did the 17 years start before 1983?

[goodnesswins]

I'm having the same reaction as you....

[Vaquero]

SCOOTER SIDESTEPS INDICTMENT

[tom paine 2]

I'm with you between Pinkus Green and marc Rich these two manipulated the aluminum markets, traded with dictators. If Libby is connected with them he needs to be in jail.

[churchillbuff]

This is the first time I have read of a Marc Rich / Lewis Libby connection."""

Our conservative "opinion leaders" aren't telling us some crucial facts. You won't learn about this from Hannity or Rush. But for drawing attention to it, I'm confident I'll be called a "troll" by some 'bots. Trouble is, I have to be consistent: I was yelling my lungs out against Clinton when he pardoned Rich. (Didn't Rush also have a problem with that pardon?) Why should I remain silent about Libby, now -- except out of unthinking partisanship, and that's not my style - - I put principles first.

[sgtbono2002]

If this is true , what is Libby doing on Cheney's staff to begin with?

[aft_lizard]

OMG a lawyer congratulated his client! What is the world coming too.

[churchillbuff]

If this is true"""

Oh, it's true. Google "Marc Rich" and "Libby" and you'll find considerable reporting that establishes the truth.

[churchillbuff]

OMG a lawyer congratulated his client! What is the world coming too."""

It's the nature of the client. Why do Republicans want to defend a mouthpiece for a sleazeball?

[weegee]

Throw him in jail? For connection to the same crime the main perp was pardoned? Do you support letting the triggerman in a driveby getting a lesser sentence than the driver just because the shooter cops a plea bargain to give up the other names?

[aft_lizard]

No its not the nature of the client. Everbody deserves legal representation, it doesnt make the lawyer in question bad.

[churchillbuff]

Sounds like you don't know much about Marc Rich. A big Clinton outrage. You should do some research.

[churchillbuff]

ping

[aft_lizard]

I know about Rich and the pardon. I just dont see how you can stretch that into his legal representation being bad. The man did his job, what he was paid to do, unless you can point out that he, Scooter Libby, commited some crime in performing his duties then this is a moot point. Guilt by association is not becoming of any freeper.

[Madeleine Ward]

Yes, everyone deserves representation.

Incidentally, have you noticed anyone dissing the defense attorney who's representing Delay?

And believe it or not, there are still some lawyers who maintain a gentlemanly comport in all their dealings, which includes congratulating your opponent who beat you in a bitterly fought case, and could even extend to congratulating a client.

On the other hand, I think Cheney should not have hired this guy knowing the connections he had to Rich.