Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: G.Mason
My Freeper friend, there is enough information and disinformation on these internet pages to make one go deaf, dumb and blind. """

National Review's on-site coverage of the hearing is not disinformation. Read post 31. Nobody denies that Libby was Marc Rich's lawyer. If you do, you live in a self-created fantasy world.

58 posted on 10/25/2005 11:20:53 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: churchillbuff
"Nobody denies that Libby was Marc Rich's lawyer. If you do, you live in a self-created fantasy world."


Whoa there parder!

I DID NOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT LIBBY BEING RICH'S LAWYER, ONCE UPON A TIME.


I simply asked you "How exactly was this determined to be true, and by whom?" ... In reference to the allegation that Libby called Rich in Switzwerland two days after George W. Bush was sworn in as president.


How's your attention span doing?



65 posted on 10/25/2005 11:29:20 AM PDT by G.Mason (Americas most based enemy is the Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson