Oh now it's "woefully" unqualified is it?
Bahahaha! You people are in for a rude awakening. Have you even read any of her writings or are you just looking at what the NRO has been putting out?
Huh? Where in my post did I apply woefully unqualified to Miers? I replied to your assertion that there were not qualifications explicitly set out in the constitution. I pointed out that the nominee still has to get pass through senate. Nominees can make it through dispute ideological differences (Ginsberg), but not for lack of qualifications.
Geesh, you are over sensitive.
Her writings are the problem. When asked to anme her favorit legal writer, you know she picked:
John Grisham.
Enough said. Do you can at all about the message this sends?
If she were so qualified, why didn't GWB appoint her earlier to a district court or appellate court? He could have done so, see how she did, and then consider her for the court.
"Have you even read any of her writings or are you just looking at what the NRO has been putting out?"
What are the good writings that I should be reading? I read David Brooks discussion and her writings were, to be charitable, not great.