Skip to comments.
Fitzerald Indictments : Post Your Predictions Here
10/26/2005
| Myself
Posted on 10/26/2005 8:24:41 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 241-256 next last
To: Howlin
Seems like he can't make up his mind what to do before the Grand Jury ends this week.
He's not exactly behaving like a prosecutor who's sure of himself and his case.
61
posted on
10/26/2005 8:36:14 AM PDT
by
ml1954
To: SirLinksalot; samadams2000
Wilson, Pincus, Cooper and some CIA bureaucrats. Maybe Miller....
sam- time for your R-U-S-S-E-R-T ;^)
62
posted on
10/26/2005 8:36:17 AM PDT
by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
To: SirLinksalot
Libby and Rove, with a 50% chance of Cheney. Makes me want to toss my breakfast, but it's what I think.
To: FlingWingFlyer
I don't think Fitzgerald gives a hoot about the MSM. The problem is that he may feel he needs 'something' to justify the time and money involved. It's not encouraging that Fitzgerald apparently praised Stewart's prosecution.
On the other hand, if someone lied to an investigator during an on-going investigation, then a crime was committed. But then Wilson, his wife, and others have far more motivation to lie than anyone in the admin.
To: Red Badger
"WILSON, MILLER and the former CIA director........"
Wishful thinking. will go with Libby, Miller, and one currently unsuspected by the pundits.
I had heard there was a romance 'tween Libby & Miller. Anything come of that?
65
posted on
10/26/2005 8:37:06 AM PDT
by
lawdude
(Err Amerika induces "in-talk-sication".)
To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
But the neighbors are saying they didn't know she was CIA. I thought it was public knowledge.
To: SirLinksalot
I predict someone will write a book about this
67
posted on
10/26/2005 8:37:16 AM PDT
by
woofie
To: SirLinksalot
John Kerry indicted for treason for giving aid and comfort to the North Vietnamese government in 1971.
68
posted on
10/26/2005 8:37:22 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Perdogg
69
posted on
10/26/2005 8:37:28 AM PDT
by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
To: TXBSAFH
It will be fun to watch the Lefty's reaction to Rove not being indicted. They want it so bad. It will be a mass hand-wringing and whining fest. No one really knew who Libby was until last week. They could really care less about him.
70
posted on
10/26/2005 8:37:30 AM PDT
by
skikvt
To: NittanyLion
I think that 0-5 people will be indicted. Further, it's probable that some of these people will be either within the administration, the CIA, or private citizens.... Going out on a limb there with that pick aren't you?????
71
posted on
10/26/2005 8:37:51 AM PDT
by
kjam22
To: SirLinksalot
I'm actually leaning more towards no indictments at all right at the moment, but if there are indictments, I'll go with the following:
Libby indicted
Miller indicted
Outside shot of Wilson and/or Plame being indicted (even though it should be a slam dunk, imo)
To: Alberta's Child
I agree. Too much of a National Security risk to go to trial. Defense lawyers would make a fiasco out of this.
Yesterday it was leaked that Fitzgerald was at Rove's Lawyers office. Don't you think that the lawyer wasn't spelling that out to the prosecutor.
73
posted on
10/26/2005 8:38:20 AM PDT
by
golfisnr1
(Democrats are like roaches, hard to get rid of.>)
To: SirLinksalot
Libby, Miller and Cheney.
74
posted on
10/26/2005 8:38:22 AM PDT
by
CobaltBlue
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: kjam22
LOL. I'll go one further and say that the result will prompt extensive media coverage for an indeterminate period of time.
Just remember - you heard it here first... ;-)
To: SirLinksalot; All
Per CNN:
No public announcement expected today from special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald in CIA leak probe, source tells CNN.
To: SirLinksalot
In real terms there is no way for them to follow the law as it is written and get a conviction on even a ham sandwich.
Now, if the prosecutor is a normal run-of-the-mill cheap political hack dem he will indict some or all repubs ever mentioned regardless of evidence because doing so will fix guilt in the minds of a large segment of the clueless and non-critical thinking american population.
The scumbag rat party knows this and will draw it out as long as possible regardless of a nil possibility of conviction in order to gnaw at the gop and Bush.
77
posted on
10/26/2005 8:39:43 AM PDT
by
RJS1950
(The rats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
To: kjam22
Someone from the CIA if Tenet was by-passed at the time of Wilson's appointment to Niger. Whoever went to Valerie to make sure that Joe (an outsider) got the appoinment and possibly Valerie herself. That's why Wilson published his "Hey, it's me" article....To get Valerie off the hook. His comment to Novak "Keep my wife out of this" is the key. That's kinda like saying "I dare you".
Yup, even sounds confusing to me.
78
posted on
10/26/2005 8:39:52 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: SirLinksalot
To: edcoil
"I think it will be like the Myers announcment.
Someone will get indicted but we don't yet know that person yet."
I predict someone will find a way to indict Harriet.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 241-256 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson