Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fitzerald Indictments : Post Your Predictions Here
10/26/2005 | Myself

Posted on 10/26/2005 8:24:41 AM PDT by SirLinksalot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-256 next last
To: Howlin

Seems like he can't make up his mind what to do before the Grand Jury ends this week.

He's not exactly behaving like a prosecutor who's sure of himself and his case.


61 posted on 10/26/2005 8:36:14 AM PDT by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot; samadams2000
Wilson, Pincus, Cooper and some CIA bureaucrats. Maybe Miller....

sam- time for your R-U-S-S-E-R-T ;^)

62 posted on 10/26/2005 8:36:17 AM PDT by eureka! (Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Libby and Rove, with a 50% chance of Cheney. Makes me want to toss my breakfast, but it's what I think.


63 posted on 10/26/2005 8:36:49 AM PDT by doesnt suffer fools gladly (Court TV and The Weather Channel have merged and become Fox News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
I don't think Fitzgerald gives a hoot about the MSM. The problem is that he may feel he needs 'something' to justify the time and money involved. It's not encouraging that Fitzgerald apparently praised Stewart's prosecution.

On the other hand, if someone lied to an investigator during an on-going investigation, then a crime was committed. But then Wilson, his wife, and others have far more motivation to lie than anyone in the admin.

64 posted on 10/26/2005 8:37:02 AM PDT by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

"WILSON, MILLER and the former CIA director........"

Wishful thinking. will go with Libby, Miller, and one currently unsuspected by the pundits.

I had heard there was a romance 'tween Libby & Miller. Anything come of that?


65 posted on 10/26/2005 8:37:06 AM PDT by lawdude (Err Amerika induces "in-talk-sication".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

But the neighbors are saying they didn't know she was CIA. I thought it was public knowledge.


66 posted on 10/26/2005 8:37:10 AM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I predict someone will write a book about this


67 posted on 10/26/2005 8:37:16 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

John Kerry indicted for treason for giving aid and comfort to the North Vietnamese government in 1971.


68 posted on 10/26/2005 8:37:22 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

FYI


69 posted on 10/26/2005 8:37:28 AM PDT by eureka! (Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

It will be fun to watch the Lefty's reaction to Rove not being indicted. They want it so bad. It will be a mass hand-wringing and whining fest. No one really knew who Libby was until last week. They could really care less about him.


70 posted on 10/26/2005 8:37:30 AM PDT by skikvt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
I think that 0-5 people will be indicted. Further, it's probable that some of these people will be either within the administration, the CIA, or private citizens....

Going out on a limb there with that pick aren't you?????

71 posted on 10/26/2005 8:37:51 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
I'm actually leaning more towards no indictments at all right at the moment, but if there are indictments, I'll go with the following:

Libby indicted

Miller indicted

Outside shot of Wilson and/or Plame being indicted (even though it should be a slam dunk, imo)

72 posted on 10/26/2005 8:38:09 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I agree. Too much of a National Security risk to go to trial. Defense lawyers would make a fiasco out of this.
Yesterday it was leaked that Fitzgerald was at Rove's Lawyers office. Don't you think that the lawyer wasn't spelling that out to the prosecutor.


73 posted on 10/26/2005 8:38:20 AM PDT by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches, hard to get rid of.>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Libby, Miller and Cheney.


74 posted on 10/26/2005 8:38:22 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
LOL. I'll go one further and say that the result will prompt extensive media coverage for an indeterminate period of time.

Just remember - you heard it here first... ;-)

75 posted on 10/26/2005 8:38:56 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot; All

Per CNN:

No public announcement expected today from special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald in CIA leak probe, source tells CNN.


76 posted on 10/26/2005 8:39:25 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative (Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
In real terms there is no way for them to follow the law as it is written and get a conviction on even a ham sandwich.

Now, if the prosecutor is a normal run-of-the-mill cheap political hack dem he will indict some or all repubs ever mentioned regardless of evidence because doing so will fix guilt in the minds of a large segment of the clueless and non-critical thinking american population.

The scumbag rat party knows this and will draw it out as long as possible regardless of a nil possibility of conviction in order to gnaw at the gop and Bush.

77 posted on 10/26/2005 8:39:43 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The rats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
Someone from the CIA if Tenet was by-passed at the time of Wilson's appointment to Niger. Whoever went to Valerie to make sure that Joe (an outsider) got the appoinment and possibly Valerie herself. That's why Wilson published his "Hey, it's me" article....To get Valerie off the hook. His comment to Novak "Keep my wife out of this" is the key. That's kinda like saying "I dare you".

Yup, even sounds confusing to me.

78 posted on 10/26/2005 8:39:52 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Wilson and Libby


79 posted on 10/26/2005 8:39:53 AM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

"I think it will be like the Myers announcment.

Someone will get indicted but we don't yet know that person yet."

I predict someone will find a way to indict Harriet.


80 posted on 10/26/2005 8:39:55 AM PDT by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-256 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson