[Dark Skies]

he does not lay blame where it should

Very true

Actually, he lays blame exactly where it ought to be. At the end of the article, he talks about the enemy as Islam.

In the meat of the article he explains that the moderate adherents either toe the line or die (i.e. moderate Islam is the bastion of useful idiocy regarding venomous Islam). They might be nice but the cannot help us or themselves.

Islam is ruled by the hardliners...they want us (non-muslims) converted, subjugated or dead.

This article nails the point very cleverly. Too bad our President would rather hold hands with Abdullah than dissect this deadly issue.

Check one...converted, subjugated or dead.

Those are the options. (Freep this poll?)

[JimSEA]

I don't perhaps see things quite the same. Islam will be Islam, true to their nature and we had best recognize it. Blame for acting contrary to our won best interests should, on the other hand, be placed squarely on the academics and politicians who work against the interests of our nation and nations similarly positioned so they can seize power. I have yet to figure out what the John Kerry's or Noam Chomsky's of the world would do if, successful in seizing power, they are faced with the 1.3 billion or so Muslims intent on their subjugation or death.