Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Berlusconi Behind the Pre-Iraq War Yellow Cake Story?
Der Spiegel ^ | 27 October 2005 | staff

Posted on 10/27/2005 7:25:10 AM PDT by AdmSmith

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Brilliant

Iraq aquired hundreds of tons of yellowcake in the 80s from Niger, Brazil, Portugal, and I think Russia and others. It is all pretty well documented by the IAEA, and easy to find on the internet the way everybody but the MSM finds things on the internet (hint: it begins with "G"). Yet the MSM continues to portray Iraq's interest in post-Gulf War yellowcake as if Saddam had never done it before and as if it was some outrageous Bush lie.


41 posted on 10/27/2005 10:35:32 AM PDT by truthchaser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fso301

I'm looking for another source on Fitzgerald traveling to Italy as well. I've heard it from a couple of sources, who have varying degrees of reliability, as well as posters here.

That's why I added "reportedly" and "if the above is true" to my post.

There is also a recent post on this thread (#35 from Angkor) that said the phone on Fitzgerald's new web site originally linked to a DOJ "Counterintelligence" office.


42 posted on 10/27/2005 10:43:37 AM PDT by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok; fso301

For what it's worth...Salon reported this week that NATO sources confirmed that Fitzgerald had asked for and received the unpublished Italian government's investigation into the forgeries.


43 posted on 10/27/2005 11:12:03 AM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok; fso301
(#35 from Angkor) that said the phone on Fitzgerald's new web site originally linked to a DOJ "Counterintelligence" office.

Whoops. "Counter espionage".

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2005/10/21/BL2005102100970_pf.html

"Incidentally, if you call the number the new Web site lists for Fitzgerald's D.C. office, the phone is somewhat mysteriously answered "counterespionage section."

But as Samborn explained to me, that's because the special prosecutor is borrowing space in the Justice Department's Bond Building from the counterespionage section. "The office of special counsel doesn't really have its own dedicated space," he said.

44 posted on 10/27/2005 11:14:13 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Peach; piasa; Fedora; Enchante; backhoe; Perdogg; areafiftyone; Wuli
I was answering someone who said Michael Ledeen was involved in the forgeries and speaking of dirty deals and familiar names, the poster provided one...see the bolded part:

The first Niger Embassy break in was on January 02, the second on January 31, both in 2001, way before Ledeen went there:

http://bulletin.ninemsn.com.au/bulletin/EdDesk.nsf/0/a0f101466d6da341ca256d6b000ae3cc?OpenDocument

Rocco Martino received the forged documents in "late 2001". That makes Cannistraro just as suspicious as Ledeen if the dates of his visit to Rome are correct. Larry Johnson is a known liar and the Italians issued a press statement yesterday that they were not involved in the forgeries:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1509708/posts

This is also backed up by Martino, who said he was employed by the French:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1509091/posts

Ledeen has gone public and denied involvement:

I have absolutely no connection to the Niger documents, have never even seen them. I did not work on them, never handled them, know virtually nothing about them, don't think I ever wrote or said anything about the subject. I have left a voice mail for Cannistraro suggesting he should apologize and retract right away. I think you should get back to him and ask him if he didn't just make it up, or was repeating gossip. There can be no credible evidence for the claim, and you will not wish to be associated with it, I'm sure.

And you should also notice that you and Cannistraro have misspelled the acronym for the Italian Military Intelligence Service. It's SISMI not SISME. A good Italian like Cannistraro should at least know that!

Michael Ledeen

http://www.yuricareport.com/Corruption/StatementFromMichaelLedeen.html

And Cannistraro has a lot of nerve talking about Ledeen and Iran-Contra:

Cannistraro himself [along with Duane "Dewy" Clarridge, then Chief of the CIA's Latin American Division] headed Casey's original operation to arm the Contras, based on Reagan's March, 1981 decision.

http://www.constitution.org/ocbpt/ocbpt_10.htm

Did you notice what I just posted? Duane Clarridge and Cannistraro are old friends. If the Italians nailed Clarridge for the forgeries...what does that tell you?

Sorry I didn't have time to format the links, I have to run an errand, but wanted to get this info out. Clarridge was fingered by the Italians in the uranium forgery, according to Larry Johnson and Vincent Cannistraro. Seems Cannistraro and Clarridge go back a ways. Also, Cannistraro was in Rome in Nov 2001 according to that poster, so he has alot of nerve claiming it was Ledeen just because Ledeen had a meeting in Dec 2001. Sure wish I could find the exact date that Rocco Martino got the forgery in hand, all I can find is "late 2001". Will follow up when I get back.
45 posted on 10/27/2005 11:39:05 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Wouldn't it be splendid if he turns out to be Eliot Ness and actually indicts the bad guys?

My God, how I want to believe that. If the bad guys win yet again, I fear all is lost.

46 posted on 10/27/2005 11:45:56 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Peach; piasa; Fedora; Enchante; backhoe; Perdogg; areafiftyone; Wuli
Can't find much on Alan Wolf, the other CIA agent that Cannistraro said was involved, but I was shocked to find this:

'WHITEWASH WEDNESDAY.' Fittingly, the CIA was the first to know. But many in its rank and file were dismayed by Director James Woolsey's closed-circuit report to the staff on the investigation of CIA turncoat Aldrich Ames. "Whitewash Wednesday," one officer called it. Woolsey shared few secrets. While deploring Ames's betrayal, which destroyed the CIA's Soviet network of spies and consigned 10 agents to death, he largely blamed "systemic failure." He reprimanded 11 officers and singled out by name only one--both publicly and in-house--for lapses.

Even then, he pulled his punches. Three of the severely reprimanded had already retired and one, former Bonn station chief Milton Bearden, was only days from retirement. Although Ted Price, the deputy director of operations, was singled out, Woolsey blunted the criticism by lauding his "ability and professionalism" and keeping him at his post. Among the reprimanded but not named was Alan Wolf, the CIA station chief in Rome when Ames's drinking problems and security violations were overlooked.

Source

Then I found this:

Duane 'Dewey' Clarridge longtime CIA field agent (NE & SE Asia) and administrator pardoned by GHW Bush for Iran-Contra involvement; was Aldrich Ames' supervisor (See A Spy for All Seasons, 1997, Scribner's).

Source

Does anyone else find it strange that the two people that Cannistraro name are the same ones that worked with Aldrich Ames, the person that "outed" Valerie Plame to the Russians?

Is there any reporting on this besides Cannistraro's word? I will see what I can find.

47 posted on 10/27/2005 1:21:20 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

What is going on here? I do find it strange that the two people that Cannistraro names are the same ones that worked with Aldrich Ames, the person that "outed" Valerie Plame to the Russians?

My mind doesn't operate enough to figure out a scenario, but I don't believe in those kind of coincidences.

And I will add, much as I've always thought of Woolsey, I'm surprised and disappointed to hear about how he handled that entire matter.


48 posted on 10/27/2005 2:02:42 PM PDT by Peach (I believe Congressman Weldon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
According to La Repubblica:

In brief, between 1999 and 2000 the French realize that someone is working abandoned mines to generate a brisk clandestine trade in uranium. Who is purchasing the smuggled uranium? The French are looking for an answer and Rocco Martino senses an opportunity.

But according to Joe Wilson in his infamous NYT op-ed:

Given the structure of the consortiums that operated the mines, it would be exceedingly difficult for Niger to transfer uranium to Iraq. Niger's uranium business consists of two mines, Somair and Cominak, which are run by French, Spanish, Japanese, German and Nigerian interests. If the government wanted to remove uranium from a mine, it would have to notify the consortium, which in turn is strictly monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Moreover, because the two mines are closely regulated, quasi-governmental entities, selling uranium would require the approval of the minister of mines, the prime minister and probably the president. In short, there's simply too much oversight over too small an industry for a sale to have transpired.

Well, well, what have we here?

The French are aware that uranium is being smuggled out of Niger by persons having access to abandoned uranium mines.

But Joe Wilson, our CIA's man in Niger, concludes, solely from conversations with some has-beens (remember, he was barred by our embassy from talking with current government officials and businessmen) while sipping mint tea by the hotel pool, that it would be impossible to smuggle uranium out of Iraq.

Joe Wilson is so certain of this that he publishes a NYT op-ed revealing the details of what should have been a top secret trip to Niger for the entire world to see.

Now it seems the French knew all along that smuggling of uranium was taking place from Niger. Another outright falsehood by Joe Wilson in his NYT op-ed.

Joe Wilson must surely go down as one of the biggest buffoons in the entire history of American intelligence agencies.

49 posted on 10/27/2005 2:07:37 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Could Cannistraro be trying to finger those guys for Wilson in revenge? I wonder how the Italians came up with those names. Wonder if Cannistraro "offered" his services...

I did find something interesting that I missed before in Hersch's article:

The second former official, Vincent Cannistraro, who served as chief of counter-terrorism operations and analysis, told me that copies of the Burba documents were given to the American Embassy, which passed them on to the C.I.A.’s chief of station in Rome, who forwarded them to Washington. Months later, he said, he telephoned a contact at C.I.A. headquarters and was told that “the jury was still out on this”—that is, on the authenticity of the documents.

New Yorker

Okay...just how did Cannistraro know about the documents before they were vetted? Sounds a whole lot like Wilson's slip-up about seeing the documents.

50 posted on 10/27/2005 2:32:04 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Yah! Give it to em.
pissant for Supreme Court.

mc


51 posted on 10/27/2005 2:32:23 PM PDT by mcshot (Boldly going nowhere with a smile and appreciation for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Dang...gotta run for the evening. How did Cannistraro and the unnamed CIA agent in Hersch's article know about the documents before the CIA vetted them and exactly what path the documents took? He is ex-CIA...where is he getting his info from? I am still convinced that Cannistraro was involved in the forgeries and/or the break in. Guess I'll have to work some more on it tomorrow...'Night all!


52 posted on 10/27/2005 2:38:06 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

Didn't Dewey pass away?


53 posted on 10/27/2005 2:59:26 PM PDT by Perdogg ("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator

To: ravingnutter

I'm a little distracted right now, ravingnutter, because of a family member who is having serious medical problems, but I'm reading and trying to digest and just want to thank you - BIG TIME - for your extraordinary work and research on this matter.

You should be an investigative reporter, imo, as you are doing more reporting and digging on this matter than anyone in either the MSM or the conservative press.


55 posted on 10/27/2005 3:23:41 PM PDT by Peach (I believe Congressman Weldon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

Interesting.


56 posted on 10/27/2005 3:55:01 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Dewey's still alive and I ask the poster or moderator to remove that leftwing slander about Ledeen from this site.


57 posted on 10/27/2005 5:17:46 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator; All
I apologize that included a response to this posting without reading the entire post. I do not endorse this article, especially any notion that Duane Claridge and Michael Ledeen were involved in any way with forging documents related to the Plame case. I apologize to both these gentlemen and in the future I will be more careful in responding to postings.
58 posted on 10/27/2005 5:57:26 PM PDT by Perdogg ("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; JIM O; Bigh4u2; dogbyte12; truthchaser
Since they found yellow cake in Iraq after the war, the question of whether Saddam wanted to acquire yellow cake is somewhat irrelevant.

There were tons of yellow cake in Iraq, before and after the war. It was, as others have pointed out, acquired before GW1 and (largely) under UN weapons inspector seal when discovered post GW2.

The attempts to acquire yellow cake in Niger involved in the current controversy started in the late 90s and were intended to replace that known and "controlled" stockpile.

You're not wrong, you're just chasing the wrong evidence. The Niger yellow cake acquisition has been proven by both congressional and UK investigations (e.g. the Butler report). The lamestream media is choosing to cover that up. Our job is to ferret out those proofs and remind people of them.

Over and over and over, if necessary.

Our enemies count on us getting tired of going over the same points repeatedly. They then stay "on message" and win by default.

We can't play their game.

59 posted on 10/27/2005 6:39:57 PM PDT by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn; ravingnutter
If you read both statements carefully you can see that both can be correct. However, Wilson did a sloppy job if he only investigated the running mines and skipped the abandoned ones. The reason is probably that he was thinking of big volumes of uranium.

The amount of uranium that can be obtained from the abandoned mines is very small or not feasible to use, that is the reason that they are abandoned. The frogs had an important question, but they sent to wrong man.
60 posted on 10/28/2005 12:35:44 AM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson