Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miers withdraw plays into the hands of the Democrats
Senate Democratic Communications Center ^ | 10/27/05 | Senator Harry Reid

Posted on 10/27/2005 11:04:04 AM PDT by Tarnsman

Reid on Miers Withdrawal Thursday, October 27, 2005

Washington, D.C. – Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid released the following statement on Harriet Miers’ withdrawal of her nomination to the United States Supreme Court.

“The radical right wing of the Republican Party killed the Harriet Miers nomination. Apparently, Ms. Miers did not satisfy those who want to pack the Supreme Court with rigid ideologues.

“I had recommended that the President consider nominating Ms. Miers because I was impressed with her record of achievement as the managing partner of a major Texas law firm and the first woman president of the Texas Bar Association. In those roles she was a strong supporter of law firm diversity policies and a leader in promoting legal services for the poor. But these credentials are not good enough for the right wing: they want a nominee with a proven record of supporting their skewed goals.

“In choosing a replacement for Ms. Miers, President Bush should not reward the bad behavior of his right wing base. He should reject the demands of a few extremists and choose a justice who will protect the constitutional rights of all Americans.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; miers; reid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: Tarnsman
"He should reject the demands of a few extremists and choose a justice who will protect the constitutional rights of all Americans."

Huh?!? Naaaaaah, that's a typo. It should be:

"He should reject the demands of those who believe in the Constitution and listen to me and a few other extremists and choose a justice who will invent new constitutional rights for some Americans."
There, fixed it for ya Harry. Much better now.

/s

21 posted on 10/27/2005 11:13:52 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarnsman
If you can't legislate, litigate.

The democrat motto......

22 posted on 10/27/2005 11:15:01 AM PDT by Ben Mugged (Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil. - Thomas Mann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minn
Any stick the Dems hold was handed to them by Mr. Bush, not Miers’ critics.

Bushbots will never accept that Bush is the only one to blame for any of this fiasco. If Miers had ended up on the court and voted left, they would have blamed everyone except Bush.

Bottom line: President Bush screwed this whole thing up. Now is the time to fix it. We'll see if he can.
23 posted on 10/27/2005 11:15:01 AM PDT by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tarnsman
“The radical right wing of the Republican Party killed the Harriet Miers nomination.

I'm convinced now, that this was a set-up all along, to embarrass President Bush.

24 posted on 10/27/2005 11:15:12 AM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarnsman

Poor Dirty Harry is sad! Him and the Gang of 14 don't get to pick the nominee anymore...


25 posted on 10/27/2005 11:16:06 AM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarnsman

The nomination to the US Supreme Court is of far greater importance than some short term political squabble. It is about the philosophical make-up o fthe Court for the next 50 years, and whether we continue to get more Roe and Lawrence type decisions.

The fatal blow to her candidacy was the release of her 1993 speech. Read the pertinent excerpts. It is clear that her worldview is not in the mold of Scalia or Thomas; rather she has the Anthony Kennedy "autonomous self" point of view.

We were kidding ourselves and hoping that she was the type of Supreme Court Justice that Bush promised us in the campaign , which formed the basis for why we voted for him.

Don't worry about the Dems short term whining. If he now appoints a Scalia/Thomas-like justice as promised, this is a long term good thing.

Besides, Miers looked too much like the two comediennes on SNL.


26 posted on 10/27/2005 11:16:16 AM PDT by almcbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safisoft

Bottom line ----
Looks as though this was the plan all along.
I fail to see a screw up thus far.


27 posted on 10/27/2005 11:16:32 AM PDT by From One - Many (Able Danger - No Intelligence Failure - Media Lied Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tarnsman

Reid has to hold his pro-fillibuster coalition together. It wont be easy.


28 posted on 10/27/2005 11:17:51 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
No war. Bush will just reach out and nominate someone even more acceptable to Reid, Leahey and the others. He's a uniter not a divider. Sure, he said Miers was he most qualified, but with her help, he'll have no problem finding someone even more most qualified.
29 posted on 10/27/2005 11:17:58 AM PDT by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tarnsman

You're right. We should just do whatever the Democrats say. If we don't do what they say, we are playing into their hands.


30 posted on 10/27/2005 11:18:28 AM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarnsman
“In choosing a replacement for Ms. Miers, President Bush should not reward the bad behavior of his right wing base. He should reject the demands of a few extremists and choose a justice who will protect the constitutional rights of all Americans.”

Reed is telegraphing the fear of the Left: that Bush will now nominate a solid, proven conservative, and the greatly touted and cherished "division in the GOP" will suddenly evaporate.

31 posted on 10/27/2005 11:18:30 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarnsman
"they want a nominee with a proven record of supporting their skewed goals."

BRING IT ON!

32 posted on 10/27/2005 11:19:09 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Funny, the Dems are reading the exact same talking points as the die-hard Miers supporters here on FR. How do you suppose that happened?

How do you spell "too-shea"?
33 posted on 10/27/2005 11:19:19 AM PDT by CaptSkip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tarnsman

So give yourselves all a pat on the back, secure in the knowledge that by electing George Bush, we have given the Democrats a bat to beat over the head of the next nominee. Since the Democrats liked John McCain better, we should have elected him, right?


34 posted on 10/27/2005 11:19:27 AM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarnsman
Get a grip ~ the democrats are irrelevant!

They are a shrinking, noisy minority!

35 posted on 10/27/2005 11:19:27 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isrul

acceptable to Reid, Leahey and the others

I hope you are incorrect.


36 posted on 10/27/2005 11:19:39 AM PDT by From One - Many (Able Danger - No Intelligence Failure - Media Lied Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

A lot of so called conservatives want to "outdemocrat" the democrats. Personally that sounds like becoming a democrat to me.


37 posted on 10/27/2005 11:20:47 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

If the Dems are going to make this a filibuster, they are going to lose. Any strategy that depends on raising the bar is not going to be popular politically.


38 posted on 10/27/2005 11:20:47 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tarnsman

Um...no.


39 posted on 10/27/2005 11:21:42 AM PDT by xcamel (No more RINOS - Not Now, Not Ever Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

And to each other.

We're all needlessly bloodied now, and the next nominee—no matter who it is—is going to be bloodied even further.

I hope and pray we have not been penny wise and pound foolish. I'm glad that's over, but I am not looking forward to the consequences.


40 posted on 10/27/2005 11:21:46 AM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson