Sir, today Iraqis chose their OWN way. Why is it you have such a problem backing their ability to do so? Why do you act so venomous toward people that are WILLFULLY in the military that stands WITH Iraqis to insure this ability comes to fruition?
You do realize that MORE Iraqis have died in this fight, fighting on the same side we fight on, than have Americans Right?
Your premise that this fight is about preserving something that the British created is LOONEY TUNES and simply skirting the historic signifigance that is taking place there today.
As for winning, many missions in this campaign have already been won. Taking bagdahd, Iraq as a Whole, Removing the Saddam Regime, cleaning out Fallujah and Najaf, exposing oil for food ( along with France and Russia's reasons for opposing Saddams removal), a REAL parlimentary (allbeit temporary) election, local ministry elections, and now a Constitutional referendum. This adoption is HUGE and will codify the next set of elections as ENTIRELY Iraqi!
We have already WON sir, this is about keeping the victory and moving forward FROM IT. Too bad you cannot see that common sense for what it is.
I would like to ask you a simple question and see if you provide a yes or no answer. My bet is you will not.
Here goes: Do you make the case that a soldier dying is a reason not to fight?
Oh, semantic games.
>Do you make the case that a soldier dying is a reason not to fight?
Only if the reason is worthwhile.