Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: swarthyguy

I thought the cobbling together of these three groups into a single polity was for the purpose of allowing the interests of any two of them to blunt the undesirable aspirations of the third. Imagine the Shiites becoming an Iranian satelite. Imagine the Sunni becoming an outright terror state. And the Kurds are screwed again, sandwiched between four enemies.

This does NOT promote our interest in developing friendly democracies. It creates two unpredictable new entities.


88 posted on 10/27/2005 2:45:07 PM PDT by Burr5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Burr5

>?Imagine the Shiites becoming an Iranian satelite

They are.

>Imagine the Sunni becoming an outright terror state

It is.

>the Kurds are screwed again

Only if we allow it. We shouldn't. No need to.

>our interest in developing friendly democracies

We should want friendly states, not democracies necessarily.

Democracies aren't always friendly, look at Europe.


91 posted on 10/27/2005 2:47:32 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson