[airedale]

He'd be in trouble no matter what he said, but there is a big difference between saying a behavior is wrong or immoral and saying that the person who does a particular activity is subhuman i.e. not really human. The Catechism talks about the behavior, but doesn't say anyone who practices it is not really human.

[spunkets]

From the article:

"When asked if he thought calling something subhuman was harassment, Miner replied, "I don't in the context I meant it to be. I meant the actions are subhuman, not the individual.""

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

The Catechism talks about the behavior, but doesn't say anyone who practices it is not really human.

Could it be considered sub-human or inhuman behavior?