Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fitzgerald Brings New Legal Standard to D.C.
NewsMax.com ^ | Oct. 27, 2005 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 10/27/2005 2:20:13 PM PDT by Carl/NewsMax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: clawrence3

"Unfortunately, the info about bin Laden's satellite phone came through prosecutor Duncan Fitzgerald (any relation?) in open court: "

Yeah and the other ignorant geologist who wanted 15 mins of fame who correctly ID'd the area in Afgh. from the rock formations in the background of one of the first BL videos - nuts!


61 posted on 10/27/2005 4:25:19 PM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
All four of those things illustrate that she did not take her "covert" nature seriously, but the fact is, the CIA has been very up front with the fact that she has not been covert since 1998, five years before Rove and Libby supposedly outed her. And according to Victoria Toensing who wrote the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, it would be an abuse of it, and the 1914 espionage act, if Libby or Rove were indicted under that for "leaking" her name, since it only protects out to 3 years from the time when the person was no longer covert, and plame was not covert for two additional years beyond that time. She was not covert in deed or duties, and she did not behave as someone that was covert. And it's dubious at best that her husband and her are big algore donaters and supporters, and her husband, a major liberal, democrat contriburor, and friend of liberal Chuck Schumer, while totally unqualified ended up on that Niger mission, stating that Cheney's office asked him to go, and Cheney and his entire staff said UNDER OATH that they did not know him, ever spoke to him, and never asked him to go to Niger.

All that is way beyond dubious, and I believe it is far more believable that they have been planning this as a way to discredit the Bush administration, especially since a well known liberal hack like wilson would be the LAST person the Bush administraton would ask to go to Niger.

In addition to the fact that wilson said he proved the forgery of Nigerian government documents while he was there. Yet the "documents" he supposedly proved were forgeries, were dated several months AFTER he was there, and didn't exist when he was there.

All this is MUCH MORE believable than the idea that Rove and Libby, who the liberals say are evil conservative masterminds, made the bonehead mistake of "outing" someone to discredit Wilson, when you could more than discredit wilson without even mentioning he was married. The whole thing stinks of manipulation and liberal spin.

62 posted on 10/27/2005 4:27:36 PM PDT by Allen H (Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA! An informed person, is a conservative person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Yes, there's one set of laws that apply to peons and Republican office holders; an exemption from any and all laws for Democrat office holders. No reason for that to change since Republicans seem satisfied with the rules as they are and Democrats are certainly not complaining.


63 posted on 10/27/2005 4:28:25 PM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Allen H

"In addition to the fact that wilson said he proved the forgery of Nigerian government documents while he was there. Yet the "documents" he supposedly proved were forgeries, were dated several months AFTER he was there, and didn't exist when he was there."

He was there when the original forgeries surfaced 18 months before this trip - I read somewhere - and may have seen them then - his (former) wife at the time - not Val - was a French agent working at the French Embassy in Niger.


64 posted on 10/27/2005 4:33:36 PM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Allen H
Outted as CIA agent as early as 1999, and you can't leak in 2003 what's already on the floor in 1999.

Outed as a CIA agent as early as Aldrich Ames. Withdrawn from foreign service some time prior to the end of 1997. Married a U.S. ambassador, effectively ending chances for truly covert foreign service even without the previous incident.

65 posted on 10/27/2005 4:33:52 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
He`ll do this to protect his reputation.

And for his future employment. The MSM would do a job on him that would make them all look like they have been kind to Bush & co. if he doesn't return indictments and he knows it.

66 posted on 10/27/2005 4:37:53 PM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Bobibutu

Then why were the documents he supposedly showed as forgeries dated months after his return? That has been well established. He isn't even qualified to do that, or investigate a uranium purchase.


67 posted on 10/27/2005 4:57:51 PM PDT by Allen H (Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA! An informed person, is a conservative person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Allen H

re: not resigning because they know that haven't done a flipping thing wrong

Under this reasoning Clinton should have resigned when he was impeached. Impeachment is to a President what indictment is to the rest of us.

I would think the President and his staff would make a huge deal of everyone involved refusing to resign simply because they had been accused of a crime. If indictment were guilt then there would be no reason for a trial, in court or in the Senate.


68 posted on 10/27/2005 5:00:59 PM PDT by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Thank you. 1997, even further back than I recalled. There is no way Fitzgerald can indict Rove or Libby and be taken seriously. Some lame ambiguous perjury or obstruction chage won't hold water either. Any more than the bogus charges against DeLay. Breaking a laundering law two years before it was a law, and conspiring to defeat democrats, not only not a crime, but earle doesn't even have the evidence he said he had to get the indictment. DeLay and plame-Gate are NOTHING more than the attempted criminalization of Conservatives, because liberals suck and can't win based on their liberal ideology because for TEN YEARS America has said NO to liberalism. That's the reality of all this.


69 posted on 10/27/2005 5:01:40 PM PDT by Allen H (Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA! An informed person, is a conservative person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: jwpjr
Except that clinton DID KNOW that he had done something wrong, and the impeachment in the House wouldn't have been possible if it hadn't been established that he perjured himself and obstructed justice. He should have resigned he did break the law and it was proven

If Rove and Libby are indicted and they TRULY KNOW they did NOTHING wrong. They should't step down. I wouldn't if I were them. SCREW liberals! You don't step down and let people win when you KNOW you are not guilty. Just like innocent people accused of a crime do not take deals or plead guilty. It's a crock.

70 posted on 10/27/2005 5:06:25 PM PDT by Allen H (Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA! An informed person, is a conservative person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Allen H
re: Except that clinton DID KNOW

Oh, I certainly agree, 110 percent! I was more intrigued by the logic. The Left tells the Right that someone should resign their position because the MIGHT be indicted tomorrow. By this logic Clinton should have resigned before the Senate trial.

I am convinced it's time for the Right to declare war on the Left and its tactics. Enough is enough. I want President Bush to nominate someone who will drive the Left into a full blown, panty-wadding fit of hysteria. We need to fight this battle NOW, while we have the ammo. We might never not be in this position of power for a long time. I'm sure the Left knows this and is hoping they can bluff us into submission.
71 posted on 10/27/2005 5:27:47 PM PDT by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: jwpjr

Well that is the left for you. Situational ethics. Do as I say not as I do, what's illegal for you is okay for me. That's the modern day liberal.


72 posted on 10/27/2005 5:46:04 PM PDT by Allen H (Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA! An informed person, is a conservative person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: jwpjr
"I want President Bush to nominate someone who will drive the Left into a full blown, panty-wadding fit of hysteria."

THAT is what I could go for. I was hopeful for that before Miers, then it was Miers, and I was just trying to hold off until the hearings, but that very first day even, I said I wish it had been Luddig or Jones or Owens or Pryor. If conservatives can put MAJOR pressure on the RINOs, a REAL conservative that will do to the libs what you said, can be confirmed, but only if the RINOs are reminded in explicit terms what will happen to them if they don't vote to confirm.

73 posted on 10/27/2005 5:52:17 PM PDT by Allen H (Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA! An informed person, is a conservative person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Kiss Me Hardy

When I first bought my weekend cabin in the country, I'd had a quiet few drinks to celebrate and went out to irrigate the flower bed from the front deck at about 2 am. Well I'm standing there, attending to nature's call, when this bashee starts yowling and hissing and howling at me from the top of the table I'd just that day put on the deck. I'd also left the remains of the first-night's BBQ on it, and it was the biggest, angriest coon I'd ever seen.

Scared me so much I had to go and have another drink!


74 posted on 10/27/2005 6:05:01 PM PDT by Kiss Me Hardy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

I just learned that Fitzgerald is a Regis High School graduate, like me! I'm sure he is a fair man.


75 posted on 10/27/2005 6:18:44 PM PDT by HitmanLV (Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffettfan

"Someday Republicans might learn to fight back".

I think at this point in time we do need a third party. The Conservative Party. The Republican Party is simply not doing the job by not fighting back.


76 posted on 10/27/2005 6:20:01 PM PDT by maxwellp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jwpjr
it's time for the Right to declare war on the Left and its tactics

Right you are. Bring it on.

77 posted on 10/28/2005 5:22:00 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: maxwellp
The Republican Party is simply not doing the job by not fighting back.

Maybe we're in better shape than we think. Hannity did a good job of putting it in perspective yesterday. He pointed out we have the congress going back to the drawing board to find ways to eliminate spending, they're beginning to take illegal immigration seriously, and Miers has withdrawn her nomination.

We need to put even more pressure on them.

78 posted on 10/28/2005 5:25:53 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
• Nuclear missile guidance technology allegedly traded by the Clinton adminsitration to China in exchange for campaign contributions. Legal resolution: No indictments.

• The Illegal gathering of confidential FBI files on political opponents - as the Clinton White House did in the Filegate case. Legal resolution: No indictments.

Why the hell not?

79 posted on 10/28/2005 5:36:16 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

re: Bring it on.

The longer we delay taking on these people the harder it's going to be to win. They have spent years quietly chipping away at our way of life.


80 posted on 10/28/2005 5:44:39 AM PDT by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson