Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun grabbers don't like facts
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^ | October 27, 2005 | J.R. Labbe

Posted on 10/27/2005 10:22:39 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
President Bush signed it the day before yesterday. PRESIDENT BUSH SIGNS "PROTECTION OF LAWFUL COMMERCE IN ARMS ACT" LANDMARK NRA VICTORY NOW LAW
1 posted on 10/27/2005 10:22:40 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
President Bush signed it the day before yesterday.

President Bush signed it the day before yesterday.

President Bush signed it the day before yesterday.

Sorry. I just can't hear it often enough...

2 posted on 10/27/2005 10:26:36 PM PDT by Starve The Beast (I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Whatever faults this administration may have, from a second ammendment perspective W has been the best president in over 100 years.


3 posted on 10/27/2005 10:40:10 PM PDT by elmer fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

4 posted on 10/27/2005 10:44:11 PM PDT by FreeKeys (God created men and women in all sizes, but it was Samuel Colt who made them all equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

My recently obtained Ruger .357 Magnum says it all. On it is stamped, from the factory, "BUILT IN THE 200th YEAR OF AMERICAN FREEDOM."


5 posted on 10/27/2005 10:49:52 PM PDT by DakotaRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elmer fudd
Whatever faults this administration may have, from a second ammendment perspective W has been the best president in over 100 years.

I try to stay informed as much as possible, but I am afraid I am woefully ignorant on the gun issue. So I have to ask, are you sure this is true? Do you think that, for example, Reagan would have signed an "assault weapons" ban?

6 posted on 10/27/2005 10:53:58 PM PDT by JTN ("We must win the War on Drugs by 2003." - Dennis Hastert, Feb. 25 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed

Where did you find that "liberty" .357? I've got one and am looking for a second but can't find one anywhere.AWB


7 posted on 10/27/2005 10:54:32 PM PDT by Americanwolfsbrother (Don't hate on someone for using their mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Americanwolfsbrother

I found mine at a recent gun show. Just stumbled across it. Keep any eye on the gun shows, several list on the internet today.


8 posted on 10/27/2005 11:10:13 PM PDT by DakotaRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Americanwolfsbrother

Oops, I stand corrected. Just checked and it does say "Liberty," not Freedom. Still, what a statement to have on a Revolver.


9 posted on 10/27/2005 11:11:51 PM PDT by DakotaRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed
Congrats on your find. I check all the gunshows in the area as well as gunbroker.com and gunsamerica.com daily. The are not easy to come by (might be because I'm also looking for the SS model which I understand is rarer).AWB
10 posted on 10/27/2005 11:13:56 PM PDT by Americanwolfsbrother (Don't hate on someone for using their mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DakotaRed

I have a Ruger Mark I, that has "Made in the 200th Year of American Liberty," stamped on it.


11 posted on 10/27/2005 11:43:11 PM PDT by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: c-b 1

I believe Ruger marked all the guns in 1976 with this saying, and removed the warning from the side of the barrel.AWB


12 posted on 10/27/2005 11:51:56 PM PDT by Americanwolfsbrother (Don't hate on someone for using their mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Americanwolfsbrother

I think you are correct.


13 posted on 10/28/2005 12:24:48 AM PDT by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys
If the gun grabbers could sue the gun makers out of business the enviros could sue the automobile makers out of business.
14 posted on 10/28/2005 12:37:33 AM PDT by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: c-b 1

From what I have read, Ruger did mark every gun they made in 1976 with that statement. Mine is a blued Security Six with six inch barrel, but it isn't on the barrel, it's on the left side of the frame, slightly above and behind the trigger. A search of the serial number of mine said it was made in 1977, though.

Another search I did tonight said Rugers with that "Liberty" mark are usually worth about $75 more than comparable models without it.


15 posted on 10/28/2005 12:44:47 AM PDT by DakotaRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JTN
Do you think that, for example, Reagan would have signed an "assault weapons" ban?

He DID sign one. The '86 FOPA enacted the machinegun ban.
What was banned in '94 was cosmetic features.
What was banned in '86 was actual functionality.

16 posted on 10/28/2005 1:56:46 AM PDT by nerdwithamachinegun (All generalizations are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I just love all the indignation the left musters for the "Big,Bad Gun Lobby" while all the time the NRA and it's lobbying efforts are tiny compared to the trial lawyers lobby and the havoc they inflict upon the population.


17 posted on 10/28/2005 2:10:22 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nerdwithamachinegun
He DID sign one. The '86 FOPA enacted the machinegun ban.

Okay, interesting, but I thought machine guns had been banned (or mostly so) since the '30s. And I understand about the '94 ban basically covering guns that look scary. I'm just not so sure Bush is really that great on this issue. Better than average sure, but if he really is the best in the last 100 years then that's actually kind of depressing.

18 posted on 10/28/2005 4:03:30 AM PDT by JTN ("We must win the War on Drugs by 2003." - Dennis Hastert, Feb. 25 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The gun banners are disappointed they can't drive the gun industry out of business. Poor wittle little crybabies.

("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")

19 posted on 10/28/2005 4:09:56 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTN

Bush has been no friend of the 2nd Amendment.

Thank your congresscritters for the expiration of the AWB. It never made it to Dubya's Desk. And since we know he don't like the "Veto" it would have passed.


20 posted on 10/28/2005 4:15:07 AM PDT by Stopislamnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson