[claudiustg]

---In another place in the indictment, Fitzgerald states flatly that "Russert did not ask Libby if Libby knew that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, nor did he tell Libby that all the reporters knew it." That sort of definitiveness has led the observers to suspect that Fitzgerald has some sort of evidence that clearly supports Russert's account of the conversation.---

This would have to be a witness or a recording. There is no evidence of a witness that I know of. Is a recording admissible?

[TChad]

Is a recording admissible?

D.C. just requires "one part notification," so a recording would have been legal, if both men were in Washington. I presume that a legal recording would be admissible.

http://www.callcorder.com/phone-recording-law-america.htm#State%20Laws%20(Table)

[Jrabbit]

That's what it looks like to me.....Russert recorded it. Don't know if it's legal or not.....

[Dave S]

Is a recording admissible?

Ken Starr was able to use Linda Trips tapes.

[sphinx]

This would have to be a witness or a recording. There is no evidence of a witness that I know of. Is a recording admissible?

Maybe Tim Russert tapes his off the record conversations.

[LS]

No, apparently it is LL's own NOTEBOOKS, which are even more damning.