Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diddle E. Squat
and the consensus is that Libby is in serious trouble.

If only he had done something minor......like steal documents from the National Archives.

3 posted on 10/28/2005 10:37:22 PM PDT by somemoreequalthanothers (All for the betterment of "the state", comrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: somemoreequalthanothers

Oct 1, 2003
by Robert Novak


The leak now under Justice Department investigation is described by former Ambassador Wilson and critics of President Bush's Iraq policy as a reprehensible effort to silence them. To protect my own integrity and credibility, I would like to stress three points. First, I did not receive a planned leak. Second, the CIA never warned me that the disclosure of Wilson's wife working at the agency would endanger her or anybody else. Third, it was not much of a secret.

At the CIA, the official designated to talk to me denied that Wilson's wife had inspired his selection but said she was delegated to request his help. He asked me not to use her name, saying she probably never again will be given a foreign assignment but that exposure of her name might cause "difficulties" if she travels abroad. He never suggested to me that Wilson's wife or anybody else would be endangered. If he had, I would not have used her name. I used it in the sixth paragraph of my column because it looked like the missing explanation of an otherwise incredible choice by the CIA for its mission.



How big a secret was it? It was well known around Washington that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA. Republican activist Clifford May wrote Monday, in National Review Online, that he had been told of her identity by a non-government source before my column appeared and that it was common knowledge. Her name, Valerie Plame, was no secret either, appearing in Wilson's "Who's Who in America" entry.

A big question is her duties at Langley. I regret that I referred to her in my column as an "operative," a word I have lavished on hack politicians for more than 40 years. While the CIA refuses to publicly define her status, the official contact says she is "covered" -- working under the guise of another agency. However, an unofficial source at the Agency says she has been an analyst, not in covert operations.

The Justice Department investigation was not requested by CIA Director George Tenet. Any leak of classified information is routinely passed by the Agency to Justice, averaging one a week. This investigative request was made in July shortly after the column was published. Reported only last weekend, the request ignited anti-Bush furor.


67 posted on 10/29/2005 12:10:30 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: somemoreequalthanothers
"If only he had done something minor......like steal documents from the National Archives."

Yes, this whole affair is surrealistic, as well as stupid.

I think I am now happy not to be in the US, where serious people behave like children.
89 posted on 10/29/2005 12:55:09 AM PDT by AlexW (Reporting from Bratislava)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: somemoreequalthanothers

That was my first thought yesterday.


197 posted on 10/29/2005 7:13:38 AM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: somemoreequalthanothers
Isn't that incredible. You can steal national security documents and "lose" them and not get in to trouble BUT if you can't exactly remember where you heard two year old gossip them you are going to jail and that is "very" serious.

This whole business is nonsense.

242 posted on 10/29/2005 9:05:12 AM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson