Mounting evidence of organized election fraud up (Dem Controlled King Co WA.)

Sound Politics Blog ^ | 10/29/2005 | Stefan Sharkansky

[LowNslow]

Yesterday I finally received a portion of King County's voter database transaction log. It was weeks late, incomplete and issued only after I sued the county. These records confirm more elements of my recent article in The Stranger -- that elections officials knowingly and unlawfully counted ballots from ineligible voters last November and then modified computer records to cover it

[topher]

Why is it real documented voter fraud is never found or covered by the MSN?

For one thing, the MSM is often referred to the lame stream media -- they are proving how really lame they are.

For another thing, pretty faces are more a requirement to be in the lame stream media -- not intelligence.

The conservative movement has quite a bit of intelligence on their side -- in terms of those who provide coverage of things. Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin may be pretty faces, but they are also have much more intelligence that their liberal counterparts. I consider this to be the norm for the conservatives who are involved in the media -- though there are exceptions...

Also be careful about talking MSN versus MSM when talking about Seattle -- someone might think you are talking about Microsoft...

[stocksthatgoup]

Posted by Matt Rosenberg at 10:50 PM | Comments (9) | Email This

Mounting evidence of organized election fraud Yesterday I finally received a portion of King County's voter database transaction log. It was weeks late, incomplete and issued only after I sued the county. These records confirm more elements of my recent article in The Stranger -- that elections officials knowingly and unlawfully counted ballots from ineligible voters last November and then modified computer records to cover it up.

Here is just one example of a voter's provisional ballot envelope that was unlawfully counted and her registration records [large PDF] which show signs of record tampering --

Continue reading "Mounting evidence of organized election fraud"

This voter did not sign her registration form. That was noted when her registration was processed on Oct. 9. (p. 5 of registration records). Her provisional ballot envelope was appropriately marked "fatal pend / sig" (meaning ineligible registration, missing signature). Interestingly, somebody else, perhaps a supervisor (initials JM) overrode "fatal pend" notation, by marking the ballot envelope "OK".

Now look at p. 7 of the registration records, which shows the transactions on the provisional ballot record. The employee who processed the ballot on 11/9 correctly changed its status from "A" (active voter) to "F" (fatal pended voter). On 11/16 somebody changed the status back to "A". That is consistent with the story I reported in The Stranger that the ineligible "fatal pend" ballots were set aside until the two days before the 11/17 certification when Bill Huennekens ordered them to be counted. Even more intriguing -- while most transactions are attributed to users whose DIMS user names resemble their real names, the 11/16 transaction, like many others I've seen, was performed by user "tester02".

Now go back to p. 5 of the registration records. Consistent with what I've seen in other records, on January 6th between 3pm - 4pm there was a batch job that updated certain registration records. Among other things, it changed the registration status of fatal pend provisional voters from "F" to "A" [p.5, line 17]. The "reason" code for updating the status was "PROVISIONAL BALLOT". A provisional ballot is not an acceptable method of curing a missing signature. The signature has to be submitted by signing the oath on a voter registration form. There is no evidence that this voter returned a signed registration form. By comparison, a different voter corrected their fatal pend with a registration form and their transaction log has a much different pattern (this page, lines 1-11)

Put the Jan 6th batch job in the context of King County's issuance of an updated voter registration file on January 7. This file supposedly reduced the discrepancy between votes and voters that was discovered in the earlier voter file.

I observed at the time that the new file included several hundred voters who were not included in the earlier file. As it turns out, a large number of these magical mystery voters were ineligible to vote, like the subject of this post. Their provisional ballots were unlawfully counted and their registrations were unlawfully activated in order to help Dean Logan "reduce the discrepancy" between votes and voters and cover up the evidence of illegal vote counting.

END

my comment... Enough votes to steal the governorship?

[4woodenboats]

Google Stefan & his site before you discount his credibility. He's too loud - and on the point - to be ignored in this state, not that they haven't tried.

[TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig]

The Stranger is basically a gay oriented newspaper so it may be biased but it certainly isn't biased towards the GOP.

[Hank Rearden]

Too bad the WA Republican Party gave up, turned tail and ran right after they lost Round 1 to Judge Earring.

All anybody will remember now is that "Judge Earring said she won" - nobody will remember the 1,678 certified illegal votes.

So we go three more years without a governor, stuck with some fraudulent bitch bothering us, while Rossi puts out silly books.

[djf]

It's a huge story. But the worst part is that there ended up being no recourse in the courts.

IMHO, the courts have got to realize that if folks get to the point where they feel the courts don't protect their rights, or at least have the appearance of protecting their rights, then the next logical part is the guns...

and that's not good!

[djf]

Hey, that lying witch is enough of a governor to ram the biggest tax increase in history down our throats!

After PROMISING she wouldn't!!!!

[CommandoFrank]

then the next logical part is the guns...

and that's not good!

Huuummmmm, maybe it's time for another revolution...

[RedEyeJack]

If there is a real sharp Republican Congressman or Senator out there he or she will figure out a way to amend the next extension of the voting rights act to extend coverage to this type of crap. Conspiring to disenfranchise voters should be a crime when committed by Democrats in the 1970's South and in the turn of the century Northwest (or Chicago or anywhere else). Time to quit being a door mat for Democrat political corruption.

[bigfootbob]

I see bad things on the horizon. I've told you about someone you now know, telling a room full of elected officials and planning bureaucrats, that if they didn't knock it off the citizens were going to take up arms. I believe him.

I'm positive the Feds will intervene and shut King County down before the '08 elections if things continue spiraling out of control. Until then it's up to us to fix things, and quite frankly we are doing a lousy job right now.

We have a right of initiative and referendum a huge citizen tool available for us to use. How many election reform initiatives are we voting on?

King County is a Charter County. They too have a right of initiative, referendum and recall, unlike you and me, how many land rights and election reform propositions are being presented to the voters of King County?

I'm sure this plays into the Feds decision to stay away, thank God.

You and I are beyond saturation, but apparently the same cannot be said about our neighbors.

[zbigreddogz]

Yah, right!

That's hilarious! Someone actually be held accountable for elections crimes in King County!

Well, unless you count prosecuting a husband who voted for his wife who had died less then a week before they got their absentee ballots. Which is the ONLY thing that has happened so far.

[studly hungwell]

Of course, the logical question here is: where is the Justice Department?

Why haven't the feds prosecuted these traitors? Remember, vote fraud is simply a means of overthrowing a legitimately elected government. In effect, very little different than a coup.

[zbigreddogz]

I can't quite figure this out either.

I can see the case being made that the evidence isn't quite concrete enough, yet, to convict, but I can't quite understand why someone supposedly, but not really, being outed, but probably not on purpose, with a job at the CIA, even though they didn't really do anything covert, warrents 2 years of investigation, and this doesn't.

Heck, they even investigated voter fraud in Wisconsion, and the evidence wasn't half as strong.

[CometBaby]

If you visited the website you would have seen it in a headline there.

[GOPJ]

Why is it real documented voter fraud is never found or covered by the MSN? Could it be because the (alleged)fraud was committed by Democrats?

Ding, ding, ding, we have a winnah!!!

[CometBaby]

Don't get so defensive. I debate regularly and when I do, I am often challenged to present my source. I would laugh at anyone who presented me with a biased source.

I was asking for someplace else that had this story, so I could use it. Nobody had one .. and you sure got your nose out-of-joint.

[4woodenboats]

You're reading much more into my post than what is written or implicated. I suggested you not write off the source so quickly just because it wasn't written by a MSM source, that is all. I didn't ask nor do I care what you do or don't do with "biased" sources, nor did I engage you in a debate over whether sites like Sound Politics are more credible - and less biased - than the local MSM, nor did I attack you in any way.

[sionnsar]

Ping!

I'm traveling, with spotty access right now. But it looks like Baynative picked this one up. Thanks!