[sergeantdave]

I'm not up to speed on this new legislation. Which parts of this re-write are offensive?

The idea that property owners will be compensated for regulatory takings is correct.

Anything in the bill on economic factors trumping ESA land set asides for endangered critters?

[Carry_Okie]

The idea that property owners will be compensated for regulatory takings is correct.

Indeed, but requiring a 50% loss before compensation kicks in is not.

Anything in the bill on economic factors trumping ESA land set asides for endangered critters?

That's already in NEPA. The agencies and the courts ignore it.