That is a direct quote: http://www.newsroom.duq.edu/r20051028.html
Thanks.
Here's another quote from the University website you linked to:
"Article IV, University Standards C-6
Harassment or discrimination based on race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national origin or citizenship status, age, disability, or veterans status."
And about the proposed "Gay Straight Alliance" Club:
"Background on the proposed Gay Straight Alliance:
In September, President Charles Dougherty, Provost Ralph Pearson, and Executive Director of Mission and Identity Fr. Tim Hickey received a proposal for the creation of a Gay Straight Alliance on Duquesnes campus. Due to the clear implication on the Universitys Catholic identity and mission, President Dougherty convened a special committee to examine the issue. Fr. Tim Hickey is leading the committee of students, faculty, staff and administrators, which is examining the issue in light of our Catholic identity and mission. This is a complex, sensitive issue that must be considered carefully."
Contact Information: 412-396-6050.
So the University has the standard discrimination policy including sexual orientation. Therefore, any words criticizing homosexual behavior can be stifled and punished by TPTB. It will be interesting to see if they allow the GSA club.
It boils down to this - homosexuals make the rules, and anyone who disses them will be severely punished. End of story. Unless, of course, the University adheres to Catholic teaching.
Oh, one additional paragraph caught my eye:
"This particular case was the result not of opposing the proposed Gay Straight Alliance or opposing homosexuality, but rather the use of the term subhuman and inflammatory language in a Facebook entry. Had the language used not been undermining to human dignity, the issue most likely would not have been brought to the attention of Judicial Affairs."
So criticizing the behavior of homosexuals affronts human dignity. But the Gay Straight Alliance Club which, if allowed, will advocate same sex acts, may not affront human dignity? They have to hash that one out?