Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RWR8189
I mean how is that any different than naming one justice and having him confirmed to a vacancy that doesn't exist?
Maybe someone could straighten it out...

I think it's nothing but an interesting academic exercize. "The system" is content to operate on the word of Justice O'Connor that she will not provoke a Constitutional crisis by holding her seat past the time a replacement is confirmed.

But the scenario SHE chose to set has the potential to result in a butting of heads between the President, Senate and Court. I wonder if US history has any other examples of Justices giving retirement dates that are contingent on confirmation of their replacement.

36 posted on 11/02/2005 3:51:55 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

You're so right. Suppose O'Conner were to say, "Gee, Prez, I really don't like Alito taking MY seat here - You must get a woman here..." What can occur? The Senate impeaching her?


42 posted on 11/02/2005 4:09:16 AM PST by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson