Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: curiosity

that's an angle I hadn't considered - that it favors one brand of judeochristian belief over others and is thus unconstitutional. I like it. thanks.


205 posted on 11/03/2005 5:41:46 PM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: King Prout
Of course, for my reasoning to work, you have to assume incorporation, which some conservatives reject.

I think the case for incorporation is quite strong, however. It becomes obvious if you read the congressional debates surrounding the ratification of the 14th Amendment, as I have done. The man who actually wrote the thing, Bingham, explicitly stated, on several occaisions, that the Amendment would apply the Bill of Rights to the states.

212 posted on 11/03/2005 9:36:18 PM PST by curiosity (Cronyism is not conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson