Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/02/2005 12:32:55 PM PST by RDTF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: RDTF

Defense, apparently, can almost always be overcome by a good offensive weapon or system.


2 posted on 11/02/2005 12:35:11 PM PST by RexBeach ("The rest of the world is three drinks behind." -Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

Apparently the Russians want to restart the Cold War.


5 posted on 11/02/2005 12:37:02 PM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

I believe missle defense is intended to protect us from the nutjobs in the Axis of Evil launching one or two missles, and not from thousands of warheads raining down upon us from Russia.


6 posted on 11/02/2005 12:37:18 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What, me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

9 posted on 11/02/2005 12:38:46 PM PST by bmwcyle (We broke Pink's Code and found a terrorist message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

The system isn't designed to make us immune, but it is a nice insurance policy if one (or just a few) are popped off accidentally (or purposely).


10 posted on 11/02/2005 12:38:48 PM PST by jbenedic2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

12 posted on 11/02/2005 12:41:16 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

Am I correct in imagining some cartoon looking flight path for these missiles?


14 posted on 11/02/2005 12:47:02 PM PST by smith288 (Peace at all cost makes for tyranny free of charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

After the successful Test, the whole team was rewarded by treating them to "real" dinner. They also gained the privelege of having their heating on for at least a month.


15 posted on 11/02/2005 12:48:48 PM PST by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

18 ABMs won't stop a broadsides. They might well stop 18 warheads, even maneuverable ones, but that is only a handful of MIRVs.


18 posted on 11/02/2005 12:53:16 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

"The unpredictable flight trajectory of the Russian missile makes it immune to destruction"

Perhaps with our current system, but could a 'brilliant pebbles' type system still destroy it ?


20 posted on 11/02/2005 1:00:38 PM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF
Uh, huh. Any bets as to the winner of a lateral acceleration contest between an ICBM and an EKV?
23 posted on 11/02/2005 1:05:21 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF
I imagine that if a fighter jet could not maneuver out of the way of one of our patriot missiles, then the Russians may be in for a big surprise with their touting that their missile is harder to hit.
24 posted on 11/02/2005 1:05:38 PM PST by PureTrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF
But, but, this mf russians where broke! But, but, they are our friends!!!! NOT. And all the apologist for Russia in this forum, can kiss my A$$. No apology from me.
31 posted on 11/02/2005 1:14:55 PM PST by gedeon3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

'Unpredictable trajectory' is about as close to an oxymoron as I can imagine.


33 posted on 11/02/2005 1:20:02 PM PST by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF
The unpredictable flight trajectory of the Russian missile makes it immune to destruction

I love the hubris in this statement.

34 posted on 11/02/2005 1:20:54 PM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF
So how many kilograms of weapon mass have to be removed to make room for the additional kilograms of reaction mass necessary to effect the course changes?

(steely)

39 posted on 11/02/2005 1:27:28 PM PST by Steely Tom (Fortunately, the Bill of Rights doesn't include the word 'is'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF
The Topol-M missile:

There have apparently been bugs in the target selection algorithms. "On the other hand...."

43 posted on 11/02/2005 1:32:55 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

IMO..another justification for pre-emption.


44 posted on 11/02/2005 1:33:23 PM PST by Banjoguy (I will rot in Hell before I buy another Dell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

I'm no rocket scientist, but wouldn't anything other than the shortest distance from A to B make for a much longer flight time?


45 posted on 11/02/2005 1:37:12 PM PST by Solamente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RDTF

Lol!

It may be able to outflank Patriots, or other mechanical defenses, but that's not all we have, IMHO.

Heck, I'm just a lowly EE, and I could write a program to fire a laser at about anything that can be detected. And I am not that smart.

And we do have lasers. IMHO.

We've even overcome atmospheric distortion. IMHO.

Did I say, IMHO?


46 posted on 11/02/2005 1:39:28 PM PST by MonroeDNA (Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson