Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Syco

Here is much more thorough article on the ruling.

http://www.metnews.com/articles/2005/fiel110305.htm


24 posted on 11/03/2005 11:45:35 AM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JeffAtlanta
From the article I just posted..
The district dropped the survey in 2002 amid complaints from parents, but several parents sued anyway.

This is important as the school system did respond to pressure from parents.

25 posted on 11/03/2005 11:48:01 AM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: JeffAtlanta
From your link:

In the absence of a fundamental right, the district’s survey needed only to be rationally related to a legitimate state interest to survive judicial scrutiny, Reinhardt said. Protecting the mental health of students and improving their ability to learn was a legitimate goal, he said, and it was not unreasonable for the district to think administering the survey would promote it.

This is where the judge erred, in my opinion. The schools are there to teach, not to give psychological studies to children.

34 posted on 11/03/2005 9:02:00 PM PST by tuesday afternoon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson