Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Andonius_99
Andonius_99 said: "...one can't help but wonder if this will harm businesses in any way."

I find myself suppporting a change only for corporations, who already receive a benefit of limited financial liability for their businesses. It seems perfectly reasonable to constrain corporations from infringing rights. Sole proprietors and other privately held businesses could still make their own decisions.

From a practical viewpoint, I can't see some mom-and-pop grocery store banning firearms if the local supremarket chain is disallowed.

20 posted on 11/03/2005 1:12:30 PM PST by William Tell (Put the RKBA on the California Constitution - Volunteer through rkba.members.sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

That's a good way to look at it...me likey! :-)


22 posted on 11/03/2005 1:14:35 PM PST by Andonius_99 (They [liberals] aren't humans, but rather a species of hairless retarded ape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson