Posted on 11/03/2005 12:35:54 PM PST by procomone
OK, then, those are definitely points worth making. Thanks!
There's plenty of merit in spreading the word that liberals want the rest of us to live with rules they refuse to live with.
susie
Just because it's in a book sure doesn't make it true. Does he cite proof in the book? Anyone?
They'd counter the same of "us"; re-read my post, if you care to.
How many times has Rush been married now? Is it 3? Or 4?
I'd rather stick to issues.
liberal=communists
"I'm holding up my Magic Mirror! I see Bobby and Susie and Danger Duck and. . . ."
I especially like the part about how these rich liberals who love tax increases, and insist that everyone else pay them (Kennedy, Soros, Kerry, etc) have their own trusts setup to specifically avoid paying them.
to quote from the above review:
"Using IRS records, court depositions, news reports, financial disclosures and their own statements, I sought to answer a particular question: Do these liberal leaders and activists practice what they preach?" he writes.
and
If you want to see Moore's own signed Schedule D declaring his capital gains and losses where his stock ownership is listed, it's emblazoned on the cover of Peter Schweizer's new book
Most of the proof is public knowledge - most politicians post their Income Tax returns. You can look at the Clintons tax return and see where they claimed $4 for donated Bill's old underwear and $80 for pair of his old running shoes that were donated to Goodwill.
This - after both Bill and She Who Must Not Be Named claimed that they paid the highest amount of income tax that they could!
(If the Clintoons were as smart as folks think they are - they would have sold Billy's soiled underwear on eBay. The libs would have bid the price up to an astronomical figure!)
Along the same lines, I recently documented the fact that Robert Greenwald, a film producer and Michael Moore wannabe whose current work is a Walmart-bashing documentary that focuses on the allegedly low wages Walmart pays, trolls on his own web site for unpaid ["volunteer"] field producers!
http://newsbusters.org/node/2615
How many times has Rush been married now? Is it 3? Or 4?"
I don't remeber Rush ever denigrating divorced people, though. I also don't remember Rush ever endorsing legislation prohibiting divorce. See where I'm going?
Which is why he would author a book to slander rich liberals to get sued by their lawyers!
None of it surprises me. Liberals believe that the laws they make are for OTHER people.
Do you happen to know what vineyard/winery Ms. America owns? I'll have to add thier wine to my French wine list of wines to never, ever, ever, ever buy.
I reread your post to make sure I didn't miss anything, and I stand by what I said. Of course, you're free to disagree. That's what's great about America. (I'm sure we agree on that!).
susie
You see me in your magic mirror??? Oh my! 8-o
susie
Thanks for taking the time. My point is that they'd just counter with a bunch of examples of hypocrisy, such as Limbaugh's. So do we really want to argue about which "side" has the most hypocrites? Or do we want to argue about which is the better position?
I choose B.
(c8
Excellent point, Dan. Nobody's perfect, right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.