Posted on 11/03/2005 12:35:54 PM PST by procomone
Michael Moore owns Halliburton! New book debunks claims of celebrity activists
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: November 1, 2005 10:23 p.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
Michael Moore
"I don't own a single share of stock!" filmmaker Michael Moore proudly proclaimed.
He's right. He doesn't own a single share. He owns tens of thousands of shares – including nearly 2,000 shares of Boeing, nearly 1,000 of Sonoco, more than 4,000 of Best Foods, more than 3,000 of Eli Lilly, more than 8,000 of Bank One and more than 2,000 of Halliburton, the company most vilified by Moore in "Fahrenheit 9/11."
If you want to see Moore's own signed Schedule D declaring his capital gains and losses where his stock ownership is listed, it's emblazoned on the cover of Peter Schweizer's new book, "Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy."
And it's just one of the startling revelations by Schweizer, famous for his previous works, "Reagan's War" and "The Bushes."
Other examples:
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who proclaims her support for unions, yet the luxury resort, the vineyard and the restaurants she partly owns are strictly non-union. While she advocates tough new laws enforcing environmental regulations on the private sector, the exclusive country club she partly owns failed to comply with existing environmental regulations for the past eight years – including a failure to protect endangered species.
Noam Chomsky has made a reputation for calling America a police state and branding the Pentagon "the most hideous institution on earth," yet his entire academic career, writes Schweizer, has been subsidized by the U.S. military.
Barbra Streisand is another proponent of environmentalism, yet she drives an SUV, lives in a mansion and has a $22,000 annual water bill. In the past, she has driven to appointments in Beverly Hills in a motor home because of her aversion to using public bathrooms.
Ralph Nader plays the role of the citizen avenger – the populist uninterested in wealth and materialism, pretending to live in a modest apartment. In fact, he lives in fancy homes registered in the names of his siblings. This is not just a book of "gotcha" journalism, explains Schweizer. He says the dozens and dozens of examples of "liberal hypocrisy" he cites in his book "are of central importance in evaluating the validity and usefulness of liberal ideas."
"Using IRS records, court depositions, news reports, financial disclosures and their own statements, I sought to answer a particular question: Do these liberal leaders and activists practice what they preach?" he writes. "What I found was a stunning record of open and shameless hypocrisy. Those who champion the cause of organized labor had developed various methods to avoid paying union wages or shunned unions altogether.
"Those who believe that the rich need to pay more in taxes proved especially adept at avoiding taxes themselves. Critics of capitalism and corporate enterprise frequently invested in the very companies they denounced. Those who espouse strict environmental regulations worked vigorously to sidestep them when it came to their own businesses and properties. Those who advocate steep inheritance taxes to promote fairer income distribution hid their investments in trusts or exotic overseas locales to reduce their own tax liability. Those who are strong proponents of affirmative action rarely practiced it themselves, and some had abysmal records when it came to hiring minorities. Those who proclaim themselves champions of civil liberties when it comes to criminal or terrorist cases went to extraordinary lengths to curtail the civil liberties of others when they felt threatened or just inconvenienced. Advocates of gun control had no problem making sure that an arsenal of weapons was available to protect them from dangerous criminals."
The liberals are hypocrites? I'm shocked, I tell you. SHOCKED!
Dishonest liberals??????????????????
Shocking!!!!!!!!!!!
Anyone have any proof of this, I have a liberal I would love to hit with this info but that is the first thing he will ask me.
I think I will try and post this over on the DUmmies site and see how long it is there before I get banned....yet again...
I heard that Michael Moore has made more money off the Iraq war than Halliburton. His movie Fear-an-hype 9/11 has grossed over $190 million while Halliburton is around $155m.
Its in the book! What more proof do you need? If not true, then its libel!
Oh yeah, all of this is hard to believe /sarcasm
Moore sure hates America. Must be some real reason that he won't admit to. He needs to suck down a few beers and sit down and listen to some normal people some time.
"I think I will try and post this over on the DUmmies site and see how long it is there before I get banned....yet again..."
***
It's been about 10 minutes since you posted. Have you been banned yet? LOL
So, is there already an author and publisher for the liberal response, highlighting pro-family conservatives' divorces, abortions, DUI's, tax evasions, law-brushes, adulteries, and the like?
It makes sweaty reading, no doubt, but strikes me as ad hominem. I'd just as soon stick with the issues and their merit, or lack thereof.
Staunch union supporter Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) has received the Cesar Chavez Award from the United Farmworkers Union. But the $25 million Northern California vineyard she and her husband own is a non-union shop.
The hypocrisy doesn't end there. Pelosi has received more money from the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees union than any other member of Congress in recent election cycles.
But the Pelosis own a large stake in an exclusive hotel in Rutherford, Calif. It has more than 250 employees. But none of them are in a union, according to Schweizer, author of "The Bushes: Portrait of a Dynasty" and a regular contributor to the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and other periodicals.
The Pelosis are also partners in a restaurant chain called Piatti, which has 900 employees. The chain is - that's right, a non-union shop.
Air America radio host Al Franken says conservatives are racist because they lack diversity and oppose affirmative action. But fewer than 1 percent of the people he has hired over the past 15 years have been African-American.
Ted Kennedy has fought for the estate tax and spoken out against tax shelters. But he has repeatedly benefited from an intricate web of trusts and private foundations that have shielded most of his family's fortune from the IRS. One Kennedy family trust wasn't even set up in the U.S., but in Fiji.
Another family member, environmentalist Robert Kennedy Jr., has said that it is not moral to profit from natural resources. But he receives an annual check from the family's large holdings in the oil industry.
Barbra Streisand has talked about the necessity of unions to protect a "living wage." But she prefers to do her filming and postproduction work in Canada, where she can pay less than American union wages.
Bill and Hillary Clinton have spoken in favor of the estate tax, and in 2000 Bill vetoed a bill seeking to end it. But the Clintons have set up a contract trust that allows them to substantially reduce the amount of inheritance tax their estate will pay when they die.
Hillary, for her part, has written and spoken extensively about the right of children to make major decisions regarding their own lives. But she barred 13-year-old daughter Chelsea from getting her ears pierced and forbid the teen from watching MTV or HBO.
Billionaire Bush-basher George Soros says the wealthy should pay higher, more progressive tax rates. But he holds the bulk of his money in tax-free overseas accounts in Curacao, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands.
Check this out...some guy wants to debate a Freeper...looking for a forum.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5256622
I think a kindergarten nap room would be good for him.
I have to go to a meeting...somebody take him up on it.
1) The media is quick to report hypocrisy on the Right but is strangely silent when leftists practice it. (No news to us!)
2) The big point - when a conservative abandons his principles - bad things happen - they become alcoholics, or drug addicts, or gambling addicts, or they lose their marriage or their job, etc.
When liberals abandon THEIR principles - GOOD things happen - they have more money, their kids go to better schools, their taxes are lower, Babs has more privacy when she goes potty, etc.
That's a major point to make!
OK, then, those are definitely points worth making. Thanks!
There's plenty of merit in spreading the word that liberals want the rest of us to live with rules they refuse to live with.
susie
Just because it's in a book sure doesn't make it true. Does he cite proof in the book? Anyone?
They'd counter the same of "us"; re-read my post, if you care to.
How many times has Rush been married now? Is it 3? Or 4?
I'd rather stick to issues.
liberal=communists
"I'm holding up my Magic Mirror! I see Bobby and Susie and Danger Duck and. . . ."
I especially like the part about how these rich liberals who love tax increases, and insist that everyone else pay them (Kennedy, Soros, Kerry, etc) have their own trusts setup to specifically avoid paying them.
to quote from the above review:
"Using IRS records, court depositions, news reports, financial disclosures and their own statements, I sought to answer a particular question: Do these liberal leaders and activists practice what they preach?" he writes.
and
If you want to see Moore's own signed Schedule D declaring his capital gains and losses where his stock ownership is listed, it's emblazoned on the cover of Peter Schweizer's new book
Most of the proof is public knowledge - most politicians post their Income Tax returns. You can look at the Clintons tax return and see where they claimed $4 for donated Bill's old underwear and $80 for pair of his old running shoes that were donated to Goodwill.
This - after both Bill and She Who Must Not Be Named claimed that they paid the highest amount of income tax that they could!
(If the Clintoons were as smart as folks think they are - they would have sold Billy's soiled underwear on eBay. The libs would have bid the price up to an astronomical figure!)
Along the same lines, I recently documented the fact that Robert Greenwald, a film producer and Michael Moore wannabe whose current work is a Walmart-bashing documentary that focuses on the allegedly low wages Walmart pays, trolls on his own web site for unpaid ["volunteer"] field producers!
http://newsbusters.org/node/2615
How many times has Rush been married now? Is it 3? Or 4?"
I don't remeber Rush ever denigrating divorced people, though. I also don't remember Rush ever endorsing legislation prohibiting divorce. See where I'm going?
Which is why he would author a book to slander rich liberals to get sued by their lawyers!
None of it surprises me. Liberals believe that the laws they make are for OTHER people.
Do you happen to know what vineyard/winery Ms. America owns? I'll have to add thier wine to my French wine list of wines to never, ever, ever, ever buy.
I reread your post to make sure I didn't miss anything, and I stand by what I said. Of course, you're free to disagree. That's what's great about America. (I'm sure we agree on that!).
susie
You see me in your magic mirror??? Oh my! 8-o
susie
Thanks for taking the time. My point is that they'd just counter with a bunch of examples of hypocrisy, such as Limbaugh's. So do we really want to argue about which "side" has the most hypocrites? Or do we want to argue about which is the better position?
I choose B.
(c8
Excellent point, Dan. Nobody's perfect, right?
I do, and it's a valid point, but I predict it'll just start an "I know you are but what am I?" fest, and the actual merits/demerits of the actual issues will be lost in the mudstorm.
Dan
Apart from Jesus, right.
And so is the argument, "Which is the better position?", or "Which position's advocates have the better people?"
Ideally, the answer to each question would be the same as the answer to the other.
But that's ideally.
Dan
(c;
I just don't think the arguement is who has the most hypocrites (we all are in some way, I suspect). To me, the point is that even THEY are not willing to live by the rules they want to impose on the rest of us.
However, I think it's important that we all have different arguements to make with liberals anyway. Otherwise it sounds like we all got our faxes in the morning!
:)
I'm just so glad to be back on FR!!
susie
Guess I need to read the book and see if the evidence is in there. I hope so and I hope to see this author on Fox often.
Sadly, that usually tends to be the case.
So I'm interested in whether they're discussing this at all over there...
Here is the link covering the lawsuit:
http://www.californiacoastline.org/images/2002/small/3850.JPG
Not me, but the Romper Room lady sees you. She sees all. :)
Are you a do-bee or a don't-bee?? ;)
susie
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.