To: blam
What the hell do these goons want from the poor widdle frogs. Hell they did their best to fully arm Saddam, did their upmost back in the 70's to make sure his reactor would have been online and then supply very highly enriched fuel rods for him, that where not a part of the agreement. They refused to go to war against him. They have did their best to shield Islam and condeme Judeoism over the years. Boy! The really are ingrates.
Hopefully the French will now go totally beserk and kill huge numbers of them for the world to see. No way the L/MSM will be able to keep it mum.
6 posted on
11/03/2005 8:18:19 PM PST by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: Marine_Uncle
Remaining neutral about the war on terror really protected them, didn't it? Killing them is the only way to stop this. I don't recall anything this bad happening on US soil. So much for their criticism of the US and it's policies. The thing I like about the US is that if the police were this ineffective here, the citizens would take matters into their own hands and cries of vigilanteism be .....
24 posted on
11/03/2005 8:28:42 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Marine_Uncle
"Hopefully the French will now go totally beserk and kill huge numbers of them for the world to see."
One can only hope.
34 posted on
11/03/2005 8:33:48 PM PST by
no dems
(43 muscles to smile, 17 to frown, two to pull a trigger; I'm lazy and tired of smiling.)
To: Marine_Uncle
From the sound of it, I don't think there is any "danger" of the French defending themselves, let alone using deadly force. The poor police chief caught flack for arresting only a few over a hundred and calling, rightly, the rioters "scum". No wonder the French only lasted 2 weeks when Hitler attacked.
49 posted on
11/03/2005 8:41:57 PM PST by
singfreedom
("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson