Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KillTime

They're both good. The 5.x branch has a bad reputation, but I haven't had any problems with it. The 6 branch is supposed to be a lot better.


5 posted on 11/04/2005 3:37:45 PM PST by Salo (He hath touched me with his noodly appendage. Ramen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Salo
They're both good.

If you say so. They aren’t though. Linux has a distinctive SCO Openserver/Unixware feel to it (to me).

Once you cut your teeth on the BSD side everything else if funky/clunky. I’m sure they *could* make the same claim from the other side, but they just don’t know any better.

IMO, of course.

That said, I never made it to 5.x, much less 6. I’ve got the FBSD 2.0 Snap and 2.1.6, 2.1.7, 2.2, 3.0 (up to 5/98), and a couple of 4.0 Snap CDs.

I’ve got a decent extra machine lying around so maybe I’ll try again. Got a machine with 3.0 in the garage I use exclusively for Adventure… well, Adventure and my rapidly deteriorating (dead?) vi skills…

10 posted on 11/04/2005 3:54:07 PM PST by Who dat?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson