Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second Air Force CV-22 arrives at Edwards
Air Force Link ^ | 4 Nov 2005

Posted on 11/05/2005 7:33:08 AM PST by JRios1968

11/4/2005 - EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFPN) -- The Air Force’s second CV-22 Osprey arrived here Oct. 27. -- two months earlier than the contract’s due date.

The first Air Force CV-22 was delivered for electromagnetic testing to Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md., Sept. 16 and will arrive at Edwards in December. The third CV-22 will be delivered in February 2006.

The Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center will use these three aircraft to conduct an operational utility evaluation next summer. If the CV-22 completes the evaluation successfully it will be certified for use in training operations at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., next fall. The initial operational test and evaluation for the CV-22 is planned to begin October 2007.

The Navy’s Operational Test and Evaluation Force and AFOTEC operationally evaluated the MV-22, the Marine variant of the Osprey, between March and June this year. They rated it operationally effective, suitable and survivable.

The CV-22 is the special operations forces variant of the V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft. Modifications to the Osprey aircraft made for the CV-22 variant are concentrated in the areas of communication, navigation, mission management and aircraft survivability. The Osprey flight characteristics, including vertical takeoff and landing, short takeoff and landing and conversion to airplane mode.

The Air Force and U.S. Special Operations Command plan to purchase 50 CV-22s to conduct day or night long-range infiltration, exfiltration and resupply of special operations forces.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: cv22; deathtrap; dod; edwardsafb; governmentwaste; osprey; pork; testing; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Operational Test and Evaluation of the troubled CV-22 Osprey is about to start. This is a crucial step in the modernization of the Air Force's special operations arsenal.


1 posted on 11/05/2005 7:33:09 AM PST by JRios1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JRios1968
Image hosted by Photobucket.com lets hope this one can fly through clouds...
2 posted on 11/05/2005 7:42:17 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

What the heck is flying past that plane?

Meteors?


3 posted on 11/05/2005 7:48:16 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

That turkey wont fly.


4 posted on 11/05/2005 7:49:28 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

I predict nothing but disaster for this ill-concieved, flying pig.

DoD needs the capability, but the Osprey is NOT the answer.

It will be grounded again by this time next year.
Pray for the flight crews!


5 posted on 11/05/2005 7:50:30 AM PST by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

Those are counter-measure flares.


6 posted on 11/05/2005 7:51:08 AM PST by JRios1968 ("Cogito, ergo FReep": I think, therefore I FReep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

Thanks.

But fired from where?

Doesn't seem to have originated from the Ospre.

Just makes a more dramatic picture I guess.


7 posted on 11/05/2005 7:52:59 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

They do come from the Osprey. The most impressive thing I have seen is the C-5 dispensing flares...sorry, no pic, though.


8 posted on 11/05/2005 7:55:22 AM PST by JRios1968 ("Cogito, ergo FReep": I think, therefore I FReep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Saw one close up (static display) at the Edwards Air show last month and shot some video of it.

We may think it is 'for the birds' but let me tell you: there were a couple Chinese guys with zoom lenses who were photographing every inch of that thing. Especially the area of the tilt rotors.
9 posted on 11/05/2005 8:01:49 AM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

The flare launchers are angled forward making the flares more effective against certain seeker algorithms.


10 posted on 11/05/2005 8:05:51 AM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I like to say this turkey wont fly as it irritates a lot of people here on FR.

This turkey has been in gestation far too long. The first contract was let way back in the 80s. Cheney and DoD tried to kill it once. Politicians kept it alive, not the military.

11 posted on 11/05/2005 8:06:19 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Thanks.

Just seems to be coming from behind in the picture.


12 posted on 11/05/2005 8:07:07 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

Looks like it is.


13 posted on 11/05/2005 8:07:46 AM PST by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968; AFPhys; CholeraJoe

Thing's been flying (trying to fly) for dozens of years with the Marines. They'ed had some mechanical problems, but have had more budget problems than flight problems. (Except the one CO who trashed repair records.)

Syrprized the USAF is re-re-retesting it at Edwards.


14 posted on 11/05/2005 8:08:19 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

You are a polemicist then...:)


15 posted on 11/05/2005 8:09:06 AM PST by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

There is another thread here on Osprey, naming names of experts that disagree with the Osprey.


16 posted on 11/05/2005 8:11:17 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968
"Bugs in this here Osprey? Bugs? Bugs, shmugs. It's 2 months early, isn't it?"
17 posted on 11/05/2005 8:19:28 AM PST by manwiththehands (Big Lie #1: "Islam is a peaceful religion"; Big Lie #2: Bush "lied")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative; Gucho; blackie; gatorbait; pbrown; Peach

What do you think?

____________________________________________________________________________________
“I believe concentration should be made for F-22 eto F-35 and Comanche, and expand C-17 Global..III and new generation of it. This hybrid airplane is looking eto fore flying duck in sky. This is just her opinion.”
____________________________________________________________________________________

thank you all


18 posted on 11/05/2005 8:22:33 AM PST by anonymoussierra ("Credite amori vera dicenti - Believe love is speaking the truth. (St. Jerome)")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

looks like reflections on window from inside aircraft taking the picture


19 posted on 11/05/2005 8:28:11 AM PST by cd jones (Liberals: spreading misery, calling it equality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
I like to say this turkey wont fly as it irritates a lot of people here on FR.

Hang on, the shills will be here any minute to say it's the greatest thing since sliced bread and really won't kill that many more marines.

20 posted on 11/05/2005 10:06:42 AM PST by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson