The Libby case doesn't hinge on whether or not Plame was covert. Fitz tried to have it both ways, "the case is serious because outing agents is serious," and at the same time "I am not saying Plame was covert."
Why did he have agents at the neighbors two days before announcing the indictment? Thoughts? If he knew Libby had twice lied with documents proving the contrary, why would he still send them?
The Libby case was about Libby "lying" during an investigation of a case that shouldn't have been brought...
If HE did lie...he will be held accountable...but, in the meantime....Wilson, Plame, Vallely, Andrea Mitchell, Russert, Miller, Cooper and all of the rest will have to testify in public, under oath....yes!!!!
I know it's not evidence pertaining to the charges on Libby, but it shows that the whole basis of the investigation is thin and lacking incredibility. And the other stuff establishes that the whole investigation was based on a false premise. That someone leaked plame as a CIA covert operative, which she hadn't been for over seven years now, and that the investigation was baseless and did not prove anything, therefore it would be a travesty to convict Libby for crimes of lying and misleading the GJ, and obstructing the investigation of a crime that he didn't commit, that only took place because of the investigation and during it, and in fact it wasn't even a crime. It just all makes it very hard to convict I think.
OXYGEN! GIVE ME OXYGEN!!! A question about most conservativs not being happy with mccain!